Judgments - Civil Procedure
SRI.S.N.WADITAR(DEAD) THROUGH LR Vs. COMMNR. OF WEALTH TAX,KARNATAKA
BENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Vs. PRAMILA SANFUI AND ORS.
RAM NIRANJAN KAJARIA Vs. SHEO PRAKASH KAJARIA & ORS.
Darshan Singh And 3 Ors. Vs Additional Commissioner (Judicial)
KULBHUSHAN DANIA Vs ASHOK KUMAR DANIA & ANR
J. THANSIAMA Vs. STATE OF MIZORAM & ORS.
SANDU (D) BY LRS Vs. GULAB (D) BY LRS. & ORS.
K. NANJAPPA (D) BY LRS. Vs. R.A. HAMEED @ AMEERSAB (D)BY LRS. & ANR.
L.C. HANUMANTHAPPA (SINCE DEAD)REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS. Vs. H.B.SHIVAKUMAR
VAISH AGGARWAL PANCHAYAT Vs. INDER KUMAR & ORS.
CHITRA Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
S.M. ASIF Vs. VIRENDRA KUMAR BAJAJ
Ajay Kumar Vs Nanalal Thr.Lrs. Shyam Kumar
LAKHBIR SINGH Vs ARUN KHANNA
NK RAJENDRA MOHAN Vs. THIRVAMADI RUBBER CO. LTD AND ORS
SHAKUNTALA BAI & ORS. Vs. MAHAVEER PRASAD
P.R.YELUMALAI Vs. N.M.RAVI
However, we find that after the execution Court had dismissed the execution proceeding on the ground of delay in depositing the amount, the same question was dealt with by the original side of the Trial Court as well in the application for extension of time. Since both the Courts have given concurrent findings that the case for extension of time was not made out, we Full Judgment
M/S MILLENNIUM WIRES P LTD Vs. STATE TRADING CORP. OF INDIA LTD & ORS
It would suffice to say here that injunctions against the negotiating banks for making payments to the beneficiary must be given cautiously as constant judicial interference in the normal practices of market can have disastrous consequences as it affects the trustworthiness of the Indian banks and markets. In the circumstances as narrated above and in light of the settled law on the point of injunction against the banks to honour their Full Judgment
OM AGGARWAL Vs. HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION & ORS.
law laid down by the Hon'ble 5 Judges of the Apex Court of India reported in AIR 1969 SC 78 that in case the Statutory Authorities do not act in Full Judgment