Judgments - Conspiracy
National Investigation Agency Versus Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
SHIV SHANKAR PRASAD SINGH VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR
The State of Gujarat :Versus: Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and Ors
C.B.I. New Delhi VERSUS B.B. Agarwal & Ors. etc.
VIDYALAKSHMI @ VIDYA VERSUS STATE OF KERALA
Srinivasan Iyenger and Anr Versus Bimla Devi Agarwal & Ors
STATE OF GUJARAT VERSUS AFROZ MOHAMMED HASANFATTA
YOGESH GUPTA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
ASIAN RESURFACING OF ROAD AGENCY PVT. LTD. & ANR. VERSUS CENTRAL BURUEAU OF INVESTIVATION
State of Tamil Nadu Versus S. Martin Etc.
ABHAY KUMAR MISHRA Vs. STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)
OM PRAKASH Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)
RAJIV KUMAR Versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
The essential ingredients of the offence of criminal conspiracy are: (i) an agreement between two or more persons; (ii) the agreement must relate to doing or causing to be done either (a) an illegal act; or (b) an act which is not illegal in itself but is done by illegal means. It is, therefore, plain that meeting of minds of two or more persons for doing or causing to be done an illegal act or an act by illegal means Full Judgment
Jai Singh Sisodiya & Ors. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
STATE OF JHARKHAND THR.S.P.,CBI,RANCHI Vs. SAJAL CHAKRABORTY
39. The modus operandi being the same would not make it a single offence when the offences are separate. Commission of offence pursuant to a conspiracy has to be punished. If conspiracy is furthered into several distinct offences there have to be separate trials. There may be a situation where in furtherance of general conspiracy, Full Judgment
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU Vs. STATE REP.BY DY.COMM.OF POLICE
…For the present, it may be sufficient to state that the gist of the offence of criminal conspiracy created under Section 120-A is a bare agreement to commit an offence. It has been made punishable under Section 120-B. The offence of abetment created under the second clause of Section 107 requires that there must be something more than a Full Judgment
STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. BITTU & ANR. ETC.ETC.
JASBIR SINGH Vs. TARA SINGH & ORS
STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) Vs. NITIN GUNWANT SHAH
This Court has time and again laid down the ingredients to be made out by the prosecution to prove criminal conspiracy. It is now, however, well settled that a conspiracy ordinarily is hatched in secrecy. The Court for the purpose of arriving at a finding as to whether the said Full Judgment
INDRA DALAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
The word 'confession' has no where been defined. However, the courts have resorted to the dictionary meaning and explained that incriminating statements by the accused to the police suggesting the inference of the commission of the crime would amount to confession and, therefore, inadmissible under this provision. It is also defined to mean Full Judgment