Judgments - Forgery and Cheating
MANJU SURANA Versus SUNIL ARORA & ORS
P. Sreekumar VERSUS State of Kerala & Ors.
Malkhan Singh Malviya Vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid Down - (i) Even an employee not borne out of regular establishment is entitled to be afforded reasonable opportunity of being heard before a stigmatic order can be passed terminating his services. Mere issuance of show cause notice and calling of reply would not suffice without supply of adverse material used against the employee and affording him opportunity to adduce evidence in support of his defence. Full Judgment
PANKAJ JAIN VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
RAJENDRA RAJORIYA VERSUS JAGAT NARAIN THAPAK AND ANOTHER
Nitin Singhal Vs. Purushottam Chugh & Another
NARESH CHAUBEY Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH GYANENDRA PD SINGH
Rohit Tandon :Versus: The Enforcement Directorate
CHAND DEVI DAGA & ORS. VERSUS MANJU K. HUMATANI & ORS.
SENIOR MANAGER (P&D),RIICO LTD. VERSUS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR
HAMEEDULLAH MOHD AKBAR Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
GHULAM RASOOL KHAN Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Omprakash Gupta Versus State of MP and another
JAGDISH TYTLER Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
ABHISHEK VERMA THR. PEROKAR/FRIEND AARON SINDHU Vs. C.B.I.
PARBATBHAI AAHIR @ PARBATBHAI BHIMSINHBHAI KARMUR AND ORS ..Appellants VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
PARBATBHAI AAHIR @ PARBATBHAI BHIMSINHBHAI KARMUR AND ORS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
Amit Negi Vs. State Of U.P. & 2 Others
Krishan Mohan Agrawal Vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid Down - Framing of charge precisely mentioning the offence which in specific terms prescribes punishment for the same and not any other generic or approximate offence which may in generic terms prescribe punishment for the offence alleged. Charge framed u/S 409 IPC does not relate to breach of trust by a warehouse keeper, which offence is exclusively punishable u/s 407 IPC. Thus, charge for breach of trust by warehouse keeper framed u/S 409 IPC is not sustainable. The trial Court directed to Full Judgment