Filter by Date
Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Aditya Multicom Private Limited Vs. The State of Bihar

Civil Writ, 11054 of 2021, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS VERSUS PAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 154740­-154741 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 18, 2022

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Broad Son Commodities Private Limited, Vs. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-Cum-Principal Secretary

Civil Writ, 3203 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 14, 2021

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Broad Son Commodities Private Limited, Vs. The State of Bihar - 14/12/2021

Civil Writ, 3337 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 14, 2021

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Broad Son Commodities Private Limited Vs. The State of Bihar

Civil Writ, 13251 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 08, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

THE VICE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD.& ANR. VERSUS SHISHIR REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ETC.

Appeal (Civil), 3956-­3957 of 2017, Judgment Date: Nov 29, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Bajri Lease LoI Holders Welfare Society Through its President Versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 29984 of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NATIONAL COMPANY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER VERSUS THE TERRITORY MANAGER, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 6726 of 2021, Judgment Date: Nov 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

M/s Narmada Ginning and Pressing Factory, Harda Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others

WRIT PETITION, 7460 of 2020, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Paulmech Infrastructure Private Limited Versus The State of Odisha & Ors.

Appeal (Civil), 6023 of 2021, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

PRABHAT KUMAR VERSUS BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED

W.P.(C), 11026 of 2021, Judgment Date: Oct 01, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANAPURNA JAISWAL VERSUS INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6119 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 30, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority & Ors Versus 24 Oranges Lab LLP & Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 5799 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHER VERSUS EMTA COAL LIMITED

Appeal (Civil), 5823-­5824 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

KNOWLEDGE PODIUM SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. VERSUS S M PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PVT. LTD.

CS(COMM), 377 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 25, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/s Peethambara Granite Gwalior Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

WRIT PETITION, 19958 of 2020, Judgment Date: Dec 22, 2020

Law Laid Down:- (i) The object behind the power of suspension is to arrest and prevent the ongoing illegality/irregularity/misconduct from adversely affecting the pending enquiry initiated to ascertain the veracity of default. (ii) This object would be defeated if suspension is preceded by following of principle of audi alterm partem. (iii) Therefore the requirement of following principle of audi aalterm partem is abhorrent to the exercise of power of suspension. (iv) The expression “by issuing show cause notice” found in Rule Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

JIN KUSHAL EXPORTS AND ANR VERSUS D.J. KHERA (HUF)

C.R.P., 78 of 2020, Judgment Date: Dec 01, 2020

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

M/s Trinity Infrastructure Vs. The State of M.P. and others

WRIT PETITION, 25364 of 2019, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2020

Law laid down -  Question No.(I) : The stone for making Gitti by mechanical crushing (i.e. use of crusher) specified at Serial No.6 of Schedule-I of the M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996, is governed by Rule 6 under Chapter III and supported by Rules 9, 17, 18, 21, 22, 26, 29 and 30 of the 1996 Rules in respect of its grant and renewal. It does not show that the quarry lease in respect of Mineral at Serial No.6 of Schedule-I Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Anand Rao and others Vs. The State of M.P. and others

SA, 662 of 1997, Judgment Date: Sep 24, 2019

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Ramesh Chandra and Anr. Vs. Vinod Bhargav and Ors.

MP, 3452 of 2019, Judgment Date: Sep 04, 2019

Full Judgment