Judgments - Lease, Lease of Mineral, Lease of land
M/s Peethambara Granite Gwalior Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down:- (i) The object behind the power of suspension is to arrest and prevent the ongoing illegality/irregularity/misconduct from adversely affecting the pending enquiry initiated to ascertain the veracity of default. (ii) This object would be defeated if suspension is preceded by following of principle of audi alterm partem. (iii) Therefore the requirement of following principle of audi aalterm partem is abhorrent to the exercise of power of suspension. (iv) The expression “by issuing show cause notice” found in Rule Full Judgment
JIN KUSHAL EXPORTS AND ANR VERSUS D.J. KHERA (HUF)
M/s Trinity Infrastructure Vs. The State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - Question No.(I) : The stone for making Gitti by mechanical crushing (i.e. use of crusher) specified at Serial No.6 of Schedule-I of the M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996, is governed by Rule 6 under Chapter III and supported by Rules 9, 17, 18, 21, 22, 26, 29 and 30 of the 1996 Rules in respect of its grant and renewal. It does not show that the quarry lease in respect of Mineral at Serial No.6 of Schedule-I Full Judgment
Anand Rao and others Vs. The State of M.P. and others
Ramesh Chandra and Anr. Vs. Vinod Bhargav and Ors.
Girwai Laghu Udyog Vs. National Board for Wild Life & Ors.
M/s Pankaj Kumar Rai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid down - In the light of series of decisions of the Supreme Court, it is well settled that the provisos of the Statutes have to be read as a whole by giving harmonious construction to all the provisions of the law so that none of the provision is rendered redundant. Keeping in view the principle of harmonious construction, the third proviso to Rule 68(1) of M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 is additional relaxation to Rule 4 and 68(1) of the Full Judgment