Judgments - Rape
GULSHAN VERSUS STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
SUBHASH CHANDER VERSUS STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI)
State of M.P. vs. Honey @ Kakku
Law laid down - Rape and murder of 4 1⁄2 years of girl child by the appellant. - Sentence of death imposed by the trial Court under Section 376A of IPC. - Reference answered. Rarest of rare case :- (i) Standard of 100% crime test although satisfied, criminal test of 0% was not satisfied as mandated in (Shankar Kisan Rao Khade vs . State of Maharashtra, 2013 (5) SCC 546). (ii) In order to impose sentence of death the prosecution not only has to Full Judgment
SANTOSH PRASAD @ SANTOSH KUMAR VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR
In Reference State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Ram Sona
Death sentence awarded to accused for committing rape and murder of 5½ years old girl is confirmed. In view of Section 30 of the Evidence Act, self inculpatory memorandum statement of co-accused can be read in evidence if there are other corroborative evidence against the accused. Full Judgment
The State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Ravi @ Toli Malviya
STATE VERSUS REHAN @ MOHD. WAZID
AKSHAY KUMAR SINGH VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Anokhilal VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh
ABCD VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
SAKSHI MEHTA VERSUS STATE & ANR
P. Gopalkrishnan @ Dileep Versus State of Kerala and Anr.
CHAITU LAL VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Miss XYZ Versus State of Gujarat & Anr
Vimlendra Singh alias Prince Singh Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - 1. Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989– As per unamended provision, the prosecution was required to establish that the prosecutrix who was subjected to any offence under the IPC was subjected on the ground that she is a member of SC/ST community. In view of evidence on record, the prosecution could not establish that offence allegedly committed was on the ground that prosecutrix belonged to reserved community. Hence, Full Judgment