Judgments - Rape
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr
Manoharan Versus State by Inspector of Police Variety Hall Police Station, Coimbatore
STATE VERSUS KUNDAN KUMAR
DEEPTI VERMA VERSUS STATE AND ANR
KUMAR GHIMIREY VERSUS THE STATE OF SIKKIM
Ganga Prasad Mahto VERSUS State of Bihar & Anr.
Sachin Kumar Singhraha Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
ANKUSH MARUTI SHINDE AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
PARKASH CHAND VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Nand Kishore Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Lal Singh -Versus- The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In case of rape of an adult married woman where the report is lodged on the next day of the incident, the prosecution has to explain where did the prosecutrix stay in the night. In absence of such an explanation, medical and chemical examination reports lose their significance. Full Judgment
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik Versus State of Maharashtra
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Bhagwan s/o Ballu Nahal
Anil Vanshkar Vs. State of M.P. and Another
Law laid down - (I) Considering the amendment vide Section 439(1-A) of Cr.P.C. on the touch stone of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it appears that personal liberty of an individual cannot lie at the mercy of presence of an “Informant”. (II) Code of Criminal Procedure is a procedural law and by the amendment incorporated under Section 439(1-A) of Cr.P.C. impliedly penalises the applicant/ accused while withholding his bail application for an indefinite period which is not permissible in law. (III) Full Judgment
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) VERSUS PANKAJ CHAUDHARY AND ORS.
Raj Kumar Kol Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid dow - Fingering into the vagina would be a rape within the definition of rape under Section 375 of IPC as substituted by Act No.13 of 2013 w.e.f. 03-02-2013. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts, nature, motive and the manner of the offence, capital punishment is commuted to the Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years and fine of Rs.10,000/-. Full Judgment
MOHAMMED IMRAN VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Rajesh Singh
Law laid down - Penetration is sufficient to constitute sexual intercourse for offence of rape. Complete penetration is not essential. Full Judgment