Judgments - Removal from Service
Dhirendra Kumar Dubey Vs. The State of M.P. & Others
Rajive Nandan Mourya, Vs. The State Of Bihar
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. VERSUS SURJI DEVI
STATE OF U.P. & ANR. VERSUS SHYAM LAL JAISWAL
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK VERSUS R.C. SRIVASTAVA
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. VERSUS SOMDUTT SHARMA
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS DALBIR SINGH
Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited and another Versus Anil Kanwariya
MOHD SHAMIM & ORS VERSUS DELHI WAQF BOARD & ANR
UTTAR PRADESH JAL VIDYUT (S)NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. VERSUS BALBIR SINGH
RANBIR SINGH VERSUS EXECUTIVE ENG.P.W.D.
The State of M.P. & Ors. Versus Yogesh Pathak
Law laid down:- (i) If the purpose of the enquiry is not to find out the truth of the allegations of misconduct but to decide whether to retain the employee against whom a cloud is raised on his conduct such enquiry only serves as a motive for the termination. But where the enquiry is held wherein on the basis of the evidence a definite finding is reached at the back of the employee about his misconduct and such finding forms the Full Judgment
Suraj Pal Singh Rathor vs. M.P. High Court and another
Law laid down - The scope of interference in a writ petition against the order of punishment passed in the departmental inquiry is limited. The Court does not sit in appeal against the order passed in the departmental inquiry. Unless it is shown by the petitioner that the inquiry was not conducted in accordance with the prescribed procedure or there was any violation of the principles of natural justice, no interference in the inquiry proceeding is required. Interference in the departmental Full Judgment
Amit Chaurasia Vs. The State of M.P. & another
Law laid down - Applying an exception for not conducting a regular departmental enquiry to dismiss or remove a person or to reduce him in rank. For major penalties there must be some strong and cogent reason with the Authority competent to impose such punishment and should be assigned in writing as to why enquiry is not reasonable and practicable to be held. Imposing major penalties applying the exception of Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India is always a ground of Full Judgment