Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BADRI VISHAL PANDEY AND ORS VERSUS RAJESH MITTAL AND ORS

Contempt Petition (Civil), 817 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Management of the Barara Cooperative Marketing­cumProcessing Society Ltd Versus Workman Pratap Singh

Appeal (Civil), 7 Judgment Date: Jan 02, 2019

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sheela Sharma vs. State of MP & Others

WRIT PETITION, 29160 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 02, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Shri H.D. Sharma VERSUS Northern India Textile Research Association

Appeal (Civil), 3168 of 2010, Judgment Date: Dec 03, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MANAGEMENT, HINDUSTAN MACHINE TOOLS LTD. VERSUS GHANSHYAM SHARMA

Appeal (Civil), 856 of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 30, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. Versus BALIRAM SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 10806 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 29, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

The Life Insurance Corporation of India VERSUS Sri Kalappa M. Sankad (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors

Appeal (Civil), 10574 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Novartis India Limited Vs. Vipin Shrivastava & others

WA, 75 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018

Law Laid Down - The supervisory capacity necessarily has to be examined keeping in view the manual, unskilled, skilled, clerical work and the person performing such work is a “workman”. Meeting different professionals to promote sale of product of Pharmaceutical Company cannot be said to be manual or clerical work done by the Medical Representatives as it requires knowledge of product, its uses and also persuasive skills. May be, the Medical Representative does not supervise any person but he is the Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Alwar VERSUS Vinod Kumar Sharma

Appeal (Civil), 9957 of 2018, Judgment Date: Sep 25, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Versus Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others

WRIT PETITION, 1683 of 2017, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2018

  Law Laid Down: The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new right Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others

WRIT PETITION, 1683 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 16, 2018

Law Laid Down - The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS RAM LAKHAN SHARMA

Appeal (Civil), 2608 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Narsingh v/s Vikram Viswavidyalaya

WRIT PETITION, 8502 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 28, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Director Aryabhatta Research Institute Of Observational Sciences (ARIES) & Anr. Versus Devendra Joshi & Ors.

Appeal (Civil), 2926 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 19, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Manoj Kumar Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Another

WRIT PETITION, 15680 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 23, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CANARA BANK AND ANOTHER VERSUS LALIT POPLI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS

Appeal (Civil), 9666 of 2010, Judgment Date: Dec 06, 2017

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

BALDEV RAJ Vs. THE MANAGEMENT OF DTC & ANR.

W.P.(C), 15785 of 2004, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Union of India and Ors. Versus Ex LAC Nallam Shiva

Appeal (Crl.), 967 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 10, 2017

To put it differently, in the fact situation of the present case, it is not possible to hold that the punishment of dismissal was vindictive, unduly harsh or disproportionate to the offence  committed by the respondent and especially after the Tribunal has positively concluded that failure of the respondent to communicate either to his unit or to the nearest military stationf or around 1½ years was uncondonable. Ordinarily, the Tribunal ought not to interfere with the order of punishment except Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Renu Singh Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt. & Ors.

SERVICE SINGLE, 15678 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Satyanarayan Pandey Vs. The State of M.P. & Others

WRIT PETITION, 3178 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 31, 2017

Law laid down - The statutory rules can be annulled or canceled by adopting the same procedure by which rules were brought into force. Rules cannot be supplanted or canceled by issuing executive instructions. In the event of conflict between a general or a special provision, the special provision must prevail. Full Judgment