Judgments - Removal from Service
Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Versus Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others
Law Laid Down: The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new right Full Judgment
Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others
Law Laid Down - The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS RAM LAKHAN SHARMA
Narsingh v/s Vikram Viswavidyalaya
Director Aryabhatta Research Institute Of Observational Sciences (ARIES) & Anr. Versus Devendra Joshi & Ors.
Manoj Kumar Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Another
CANARA BANK AND ANOTHER VERSUS LALIT POPLI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS
BALDEV RAJ Vs. THE MANAGEMENT OF DTC & ANR.
Union of India and Ors. Versus Ex LAC Nallam Shiva
To put it differently, in the fact situation of the present case, it is not possible to hold that the punishment of dismissal was vindictive, unduly harsh or disproportionate to the offence committed by the respondent and especially after the Tribunal has positively concluded that failure of the respondent to communicate either to his unit or to the nearest military stationf or around 1½ years was uncondonable. Ordinarily, the Tribunal ought not to interfere with the order of punishment except Full Judgment
Smt. Renu Singh Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt. & Ors.
Satyanarayan Pandey Vs. The State of M.P. & Others
Law laid down - The statutory rules can be annulled or canceled by adopting the same procedure by which rules were brought into force. Rules cannot be supplanted or canceled by issuing executive instructions. In the event of conflict between a general or a special provision, the special provision must prevail. Full Judgment