Judgments - Removal from Service
MRS. MALINI RAJENDRAN Vs. FEDERATION OF HOTEL & RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION OF INDIA & OTHERS
SUSHANTA CHAKRABORTY VS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs. RAM AVTAR
THE PROGRESSIVE EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR Vs MR.MOHAMMAD ALI GULAM DASTAGIR DAFEDAR AND ORS.
RAJIB DEWRI VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
SWAPAN ROY CHOWDHURY Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
RAJENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA
SRI UTPAL BORDOLOI VS CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS
K.R.Bedmutha Techno Associates Pvt. Ltd. Versus Arvind Arya
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & 2 ORS. VS TARANI KANTA KAKATI
ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY VS THE UNION OF INDIA & 5 ORS.
Dilip Hedau Versus Chhattisgarh Hastashilp Vikas Board & Oth.
CORRESPONDENT, ANAIKAR ORIENTAL (ARABIC) HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ANR. Vs. A. HAROON AND ANR.
JORSINGH GOVIND VANJARI Vs. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, JALGAON DIVI
MANAGEMENT OF TNSTC LTD Vs. M. CHANDRASEKARAN
In our opinion, the Commissioner exceeded his jurisdiction in reappreciating the evidence adduced before the Enquiry Officer and in substituting his own judgment to that of the Disciplinary Authority. It was not a case of no legal evidence produced during the enquiry by the Department, in relation to the charges framed against Full Judgment
B.H. KHAWAS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Indubitably, if the argument of the appellant was accepted, it would inevitably mean that all appointments made before 28.11.2000 must be protected even though it had not become final. That would also mean that all caste certificates issued to persons belonging to “Koshti” community, as being “Halba” Scheduled Tribe in Maharashtra, prior to November 28, 2000 (the day on which Milind’s case was decided Full Judgment