Judgments - Reservation
Smt. Ranikori Versus State of Chhattisgarh
AMINA MARWA SABREEN A (MINOR) AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS
KAPIL RAJ PRINZE Vs. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS
SRI PRANGOPAL DAS & 19 ORS. VS THE STATE OF ASSAM & 3 ORS.
MD. TAHAJUT HUSSAIN VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR FCI AND ORS VERSUS JAGDISH BALARAM BAHIRA AND ORS
RAVINDER KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
DIN DAYAL GUPTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
MISS. AISHWARYA DHANANJAY PATIL Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Kamal Kishore Tripathi Vs. State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Secondary Edu.Civil Sectt.&Ors.
DEEPA E.V. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
B.K.PAVITRA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
It is clear from the above discussion that exercise for determining ‘inadequacy of representation’, ‘backwardness’ and ‘overall efficiency’, is a must for exercise of power under Article 16(4A). Mere fact that there is no proportionate representation in promotional posts for the population of SCs and STs is not by itself enough to grant consequential seniority to promotees who are otherwise junior and thereby denying seniority to those who are given Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. M. SELVAKUMAR & ANR.
When the attempts of Physically Handicapped candidates of OBC Category and Physically Handicapped candidates of General Category, who appeared in the Civil Services Examination are made equal, and a Physically Handicapped candidate belonging to OBC Category, in addition to 10 years relaxation in age also enjoys 3 years more age relaxation for appearing in the examination, we cannot agree with Full Judgment
J.ASHOKA Vs. UNIV.OF AGR.SC.& ORS.
VIVEK SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P & ANR
The High Court reiterated the settled position of law that reservation for the physically handicapped category was to be provided as a matter of law and that such reservation was to be made on the basis of total sanctioned strength and not on the basis of available vacancy of a recruitment year. We are satisfied that the reservation which must be provided for, as a Full Judgment
STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Vs. DR. DINESH SINGH CHAUHAN
30. As aforesaid, Regulations have been framed by an Expert Body based on past experience and including the necessity to reckon the services and experience gained by the in-service candidates in notified remote and difficult areas in the State. The proviso prescribes the measure for giving incentive marks to in-service candidates who have worked in notified remote and Full Judgment
B.H. KHAWAS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Indubitably, if the argument of the appellant was accepted, it would inevitably mean that all appointments made before 28.11.2000 must be protected even though it had not become final. That would also mean that all caste certificates issued to persons belonging to “Koshti” community, as being “Halba” Scheduled Tribe in Maharashtra, prior to November 28, 2000 (the day on which Milind’s case was decided Full Judgment