Judgments - Reservation
B.K.PAVITRA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
It is clear from the above discussion that exercise for determining ‘inadequacy of representation’, ‘backwardness’ and ‘overall efficiency’, is a must for exercise of power under Article 16(4A). Mere fact that there is no proportionate representation in promotional posts for the population of SCs and STs is not by itself enough to grant consequential seniority to promotees who are otherwise junior and thereby denying seniority to those who are given Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. M. SELVAKUMAR & ANR.
When the attempts of Physically Handicapped candidates of OBC Category and Physically Handicapped candidates of General Category, who appeared in the Civil Services Examination are made equal, and a Physically Handicapped candidate belonging to OBC Category, in addition to 10 years relaxation in age also enjoys 3 years more age relaxation for appearing in the examination, we cannot agree with Full Judgment
J.ASHOKA Vs. UNIV.OF AGR.SC.& ORS.
VIVEK SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P & ANR
The High Court reiterated the settled position of law that reservation for the physically handicapped category was to be provided as a matter of law and that such reservation was to be made on the basis of total sanctioned strength and not on the basis of available vacancy of a recruitment year. We are satisfied that the reservation which must be provided for, as a Full Judgment
STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Vs. DR. DINESH SINGH CHAUHAN
30. As aforesaid, Regulations have been framed by an Expert Body based on past experience and including the necessity to reckon the services and experience gained by the in-service candidates in notified remote and difficult areas in the State. The proviso prescribes the measure for giving incentive marks to in-service candidates who have worked in notified remote and Full Judgment
B.H. KHAWAS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Indubitably, if the argument of the appellant was accepted, it would inevitably mean that all appointments made before 28.11.2000 must be protected even though it had not become final. That would also mean that all caste certificates issued to persons belonging to “Koshti” community, as being “Halba” Scheduled Tribe in Maharashtra, prior to November 28, 2000 (the day on which Milind’s case was decided Full Judgment
AJAY KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
RAJEEV KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
N.S. KAPUR AND ORS. V/s S G T B KHALSA COLLEGE AND ORS
R.B. Rai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
27. Thus, taking overall view of the matter, the existing provision relating to reservation, backlog vacancies, carryforward of backlog vacancies and the operation of roster, contained in the Rules of 2002 runs contrary to the constitutional provisions contained in clause (4A) and (4B) of Article 16 and Article 335 of the Constitution and the law predicated in M. Nagaraj (supra), are declared ultra vires and non-est in law. 28. Consequently, various promotions of SCs/STs category made on the basis of these Full Judgment
ASHOK KUMAR GIRI Vs. GOVT. OF INDIA AND ORS
T.KOCHA Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
STATE OF U.P.& ORS Vs. RAVINDRA KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA SC/ST EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA SC/ST EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
AJITHKUMAR P AND ORS Vs. REMIN K R AND ORS
In view of the legal position enunciated by this Court in the aforesaid cases the conclusion is irresistible that a student who is entitled to be admitted on the basis of merit though belonging to a reserved category cannot be considered to be admitted against seats reserved for reserved category. It is application Full Judgment
S.PANNEER SELVAM & ORS. Vs. GOVT.OF T.NADU & ORS.
The concept of ‘catch-up rule’ and ‘consequential seniority’ is judicially evolved concepts to control the extent of reservation. The question of reservation and the associated promotion and the consequential seniority have been the matter of discussion in various decisions of this Court. The matter regarding reservation in promotions was considered by a nine Judge Bench of this Court in Indra Sawhney And Ors. vs. Full Judgment
RAJESHWAR BABURAO BONE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
RAM SINGH & ORS Vs. UOI
The challenge in the present group of writ petitions is to a Notification published in the Gazette of India dated 04.03.2014 by which the Jat Community has been included in the Central List of Backward Classes for the States of Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, NCT of Delhi, Bharatpur and Dholpur districts of Rajasthan, Full Judgment
K.P. Manu Versus Chairman, Scrutiny Committee for Verification of Community Certificate
As we perceive, the controversy fundamentally has three arenas, namely, (1) whether on conversion and at what stage a person born to Christian parents can, after reconversion to the Hindu religion, be eligible to claim the benefit of his original caste; (ii) whether after his eligibility is accepted and his original community on a collective basis takes him within its fold, he still can be denied the Full Judgment