Judgments - Seniority
T.P. Sharma Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - "If an employee has worked for less than 90 days in a department, whether his CR could be considered by the DPC for promotion - Held- No. "Whether the claim of the petitioner could not be ignored by taking into consideration the uncommunicated annual confidential report- Held- Yes. Full Judgment
DR. PRABODH CHANDRA GOSWAMI VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
Mrigank Johri & Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors.
C. CHAKKARAVARTHY & ORS. Vs. TMT. M. SATYAVATHY, I.A.S., & ORS.
The question that fell for consideration therein was whether the practice adopted by the Government of Pondicherry of counting the service of Section Officers/Junior Engineers who have qualified as graduates while in service only from the date they passed the degree or equivalent examination for purposes of promotion to the post of Assistant Engineers under Rule 11(1) of the Government of Pondicherry Assistant Full Judgment
MAJOR GENERAL R.P. MUND Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
S.PANNEER SELVAM & ORS. Vs. GOVT.OF T.NADU & ORS.
The concept of ‘catch-up rule’ and ‘consequential seniority’ is judicially evolved concepts to control the extent of reservation. The question of reservation and the associated promotion and the consequential seniority have been the matter of discussion in various decisions of this Court. The matter regarding reservation in promotions was considered by a nine Judge Bench of this Court in Indra Sawhney And Ors. vs. Full Judgment
A. RAGHU, SON OF RAJAIAH Vs. GOVT. OF A.P. & ORS.
The judgments cited pertain to the particular rule of seniority, which was subject matter of consideration. None of the seniority rules which were taken into consideration is akin to rule 15 which is to be applied for determining the inter se seniority of Sub- Inspectors of Police, in the present case. Full Judgment