Judgments - Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds
SHRI. VIKAR ANSAR SHAIKH AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH SECRETARY, PLANNING DEPT AND ANR
Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. VERSUS M. Mani
Sunaina Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors.
It is a settled principle of law that normally no person can be promoted with retrospective effect from a date when he was not born in the cadre. The normal rule is that a person is entitled to seniority only from the date when the said person actually joins the post. True it is, that there are exceptions and sometimes “in service”candidates can be granted promotion from a date anterior to their being regularly promoted/appointed.However, this canbe done only if the Full Judgment
Mohammed Faizal K.A. Versus: D. Sali and Ors.
R.P. TAK Vs. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRIES & PUBLIC ENTERPRISES AND ANR
AJMER SINGH Vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
SURENDER SINGH Vs. THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
DTC Vs. SAROOP SINGH(THROUGH LEGAL HEIR AJAY)
PATANJALI SHARMA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
D. SAROJAKUMARI Versus R. HELEN THILAKOM & ORS.
The State of Punjab & Another Versus Dharam Pal
The State of Punjab Versus B.K. Dhir
SUSHIL KUMAR KHANNA Vs. BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD.
Chakresh Patel Vs. State of M.P. and others
The Director General Central Reserve Police Force Vs Cpl. Sunil Singh and Ors.
THE UNION OF INDIA & 5 ORS. VS BIJU KALITA DAS
DR. M.N. RAJESH Vs. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ANR
SURENDER BABBAR Vs. DELHI TRANSCO LTD. & ORS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus S. RAVICHANDRAN & ORS
It is for the employer to decide how many avenues of promotion to give to which branch. It is for the authorities to carry out the cadre review and decide whether the ministerial employees working on the ministerial side should be given more avenues of promotion. The court cannot by its decision change the opinion of expert bodies. Full Judgment