Judgments - Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds
SANJIB THAKURIA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 18 ORS
MUSST. SUFIA BEGUM BARBHUIYA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
SHRAMIK SHIKSHAN MANDAL SINDKHEDA AND ANR, Vs STATE OF MAHAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
BISHNU RANJAN KALITA & 12 ORS VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
PRABIN CHANDRA BORA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
DINESH KALITA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
DINESH CH BRAHMA & 104 ORS VS THE STATE OF ASSAM & 6 ORS
MRS. A. CHUNE & 15 ORS VS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS
BAIJNATH PRASAD Vs. THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS
DR. TP SENKUMAR IPS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The removal or displacement or transfer out of an officer from a sensitive tenure post requires serious consideration and good reasons that can be tested so that the officer is not dealt with as a pawn in a game. Unfortunately, the somewhat exacting standards are absent in the present case and the appellant was displaced from the post of State Police Chief summarily and without reasonable cause. The law has been well-settled for many Full Judgment
Harnarayan Yadav Versus Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission,
PALURE BHASKAR RAO ETC.ETC. Vs. P.RAMASESHAIAH & ORS. ETC.
MUKESH & ANR. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Compassionate appointments are not a source of recruitment and they are made to provide succour to the family of an employee who dies in harness. Full Judgment
MAHARASHTRA SHIKSHAN SANSTHA & ANR. Vs. DILIP GANPATRAO LANJEWAR & ANR.
Karnail Singh Versus The General Manager
Vijay Miri Versus State of Chhattisgarh
THE MANAGEMENT OF STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. SMITA SHARAD DESHMUKH & ANR.
It is a well-settled principle that the High Court will not re-appreciate the evidence but will only see whether there is evidence in support of the impugned conclusion. The court has to take the evidence as it stands and its only limited jurisdiction is Full Judgment
STATE OF U.P. Vs. PURAN SINGH & ORS.
P. SIVANANDI Vs. RAJEEV KUMAR & ORS.
These appeals raise a narrow question for consideration, namely, whether the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of an officer forms a part of his ‘service record’ and whether it could be ignored for the purposes of his promotion merely on the ground that it was written after some delay. In our opinion, the ACR of an officer forms a part of his service record and he cannot be Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. M. SELVAKUMAR & ANR.
When the attempts of Physically Handicapped candidates of OBC Category and Physically Handicapped candidates of General Category, who appeared in the Civil Services Examination are made equal, and a Physically Handicapped candidate belonging to OBC Category, in addition to 10 years relaxation in age also enjoys 3 years more age relaxation for appearing in the examination, we cannot agree with Full Judgment