Judgments - Tax/ Tax settlement, Excise Duty
Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Girish Kumar And 4 Others Vs State Of U.P. And 7 Others
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. ECC CONST.GRP. Vs. C.C.E, HYDERABAD
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
JAGRITI PLASTICS LTD & Anr. Vs COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
THE COMMISSIONER, VAT Vs PURE DRINKS (NEW DELHI) LTD.
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
LARK LABORATORIES (INDIA) LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES, DELHI & ANR.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE Vs. M/S. G.M. EXPORTS & ORS.
The question of law which arises in the instant appeals is whether anti-dumping duty imposed with respect to imports made during the period between the expiry of the provisional anti-dumping duty and the imposition of the final anti-dumping duty is legal and valid. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SRI.S.N.WADITAR(DEAD) THROUGH LR Vs. COMMNR. OF WEALTH TAX,KARNATAKA
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMR.OF CUSTOMS,MUMBAI-I Vs. M/S SEIKO BRUSHWARE INDIA
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
LLOYD ELECTRIC AND ENGINEERING LTD Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TIRUCHIRAPALLI Vs. M/S. DALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LTD.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S RAMCHANDRA REXINES (P) LTD AND ORS Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE BANGALORE-1
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S. PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
A. PRABHAKARA REDDY & CO. Vs. STATE OF M.P. & ORS.
We also find no merit in other submission advanced on behalf of the appellants that there is legal impediment in charging levy on the cost of construction incurred by the employer from a particular period on account of constitution of Board from a particular date or for any other reason. This argument is fallacious. Such beneficial measures for the welfare of workers are applicable even to Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR-I Vs. M/S. INDORAMA SYNTHETICS (I) LTD.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA Vs. M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Vs. TVL. SOUTH INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSN.&ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
KALYAN CHEMICALS Vs. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S K.C.P. LTD. Vs. GOVT. OF A.P. & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
D.R. ENTERPRISES LTD. Vs. ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ORS
Supreme Court of India