Judgments - Tax/ Tax settlement, Excise Duty
A. PRABHAKARA REDDY & CO. Vs. STATE OF M.P. & ORS.
We also find no merit in other submission advanced on behalf of the appellants that there is legal impediment in charging levy on the cost of construction incurred by the employer from a particular period on account of constitution of Board from a particular date or for any other reason. This argument is fallacious. Such beneficial measures for the welfare of workers are applicable even to Full Judgment
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR-I Vs. M/S. INDORAMA SYNTHETICS (I) LTD.
COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALA Vs. M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.
STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Vs. TVL. SOUTH INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSN.&ORS
KALYAN CHEMICALS Vs. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ORS.
M/S K.C.P. LTD. Vs. GOVT. OF A.P. & ORS.
D.R. ENTERPRISES LTD. Vs. ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ORS
M/S FIBRE BOARDS (P) LTD BANGALOARE Vs. CIT BANGALORE.
M/S TECH INVEST INDIA PVT. LTD. THROUGH MAJOR SHAREHOLDER RAJIV GOSAIN Vs. ASSAM POWER AND ELECTRICALS LTD & ORS.
M/S. JAYASWAL NECO LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR
Dr. Sheo Murti Singh Vs Commissioner Of Income Tax and another
M/S. SWASTIKA ENTERPRISES & ANR. Vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, KOLKATA & ORS.
M/S. TODAY HOMES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.& Anr. Vs SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AURANGABAD Vs. M/S.GOODYEAR SOUTH ASIA TYRES P. L.&ORS.
M/S SARAL WIRE CRAFT PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, & ORS.
P.A.JOSE ETC. Vs. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KOTTAYAM ETC
PRADIP NANJEE GALA Vs. SALES TAX OFFICER & ORS.
The question raised before us is whether the respondent-Revenue could resile from a settlement entered into with the assessee on the basis of which the appellant has already paid and settled his dues under the Act. “In a Taxing Act one has to look merely at what is clearly said. There is no room for any intendment. There is no equity about a tax. There Full Judgment