Judgments - Tenancy
SHABBIR BHAI MORBIWALA AND 15 ORS Vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND 2 ORS
MUJIBUR REHMAN HAJI ISRAR ALAM SIDDIQUI Vs M/S. K. T. KUBAL AND CO
LALDHARI MISTRI(DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR VERSUS VIJAY KUMAR
Padam Chandra Sahu And Another Vs. Smt. Suman Sahu And 2 Others
GAURI SHANKAR Vs. RAKESH KUMAR AND ORS.
OM PRAKASH AND ANR. Vs. MISHRI LAL (DEAD) REP. BY HIS LR. SAVITRI DEVI
That a tenant during the continuance of the tenancy is debarred on the doctrine of estoppel from denying the title of his landlord through whom he claims tenancy, as is enshrined in Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is so well-settled a legal postulation that no decision need be cited to further consolidate the same. Full Judgment
MEHMOODA GULSHAN Vs. JAVAID HUSSAIN MUNGLOO
Whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean occupation by a member of the family, in this case, the son, is the short question arising for consideration. The premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone; but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord. It has been established in the facts of this case that the landlord was not happy and Full Judgment
VIJAY KUMAR AHLUWALIA AND ORS Vs. BISHAN CHAND MAHESHWARI AND ANR
It is a settled principle of law that while considering the grant of leave to contest the eviction proceedings under the Rent Laws, the Authority/Court is not expected to examine the merits and demerits of the grounds raised in the application for grant of leave to contest and if the Authority/Court finds that the grounds raised prima facie disclose Full Judgment
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Based on the interpretation placed by us on Section 4A(4) of the MMDR Act, and Rule 28 of the Mineral Concession Rules, we can draw the following conclusions. Firstly, unless an order is passed by the State Government declaring, that a mining lease has lapsed, the mining lease would be deemed to be subsisting, up to the date of expiry of the Full Judgment
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Vs. GOTAN LIME STONE KHANIJ UDYOG AND ANR.
VISHAL N KALSARIA Vs. BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
M/S. BOORUGU MAHADEV & SONS & ANR. Vs. SIRIGIRI NARASING RAO & ORS.
It is also now a settled principle of law that the concept of ownership in a landlord-tenant litigation governed by Rent control laws has to be distinguished from the one in a title suit. Indeed, ownership is a relative term, the import whereof depends on the context in which it is used. In rent control legislation, the landlord can be said to be the Full Judgment