Judgments - Tenancy
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Based on the interpretation placed by us on Section 4A(4) of the MMDR Act, and Rule 28 of the Mineral Concession Rules, we can draw the following conclusions. Firstly, unless an order is passed by the State Government declaring, that a mining lease has lapsed, the mining lease would be deemed to be subsisting, up to the date of expiry of the Full Judgment
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Vs. GOTAN LIME STONE KHANIJ UDYOG AND ANR.
VISHAL N KALSARIA Vs. BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
M/S. BOORUGU MAHADEV & SONS & ANR. Vs. SIRIGIRI NARASING RAO & ORS.
It is also now a settled principle of law that the concept of ownership in a landlord-tenant litigation governed by Rent control laws has to be distinguished from the one in a title suit. Indeed, ownership is a relative term, the import whereof depends on the context in which it is used. In rent control legislation, the landlord can be said to be the Full Judgment
DELHI DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR
S.M. ASIF Vs. VIRENDRA KUMAR BAJAJ
FAIRGROWTH FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. Vs. CUSTODIAN & ANR.
SHYAM LAL Vs. DEEPA DASS CHELA RAM CHELA GARIB DASS
The question that arises for consideration is as to whether the plaintiff-appellant became a trespasser after expiry of the lease period or continued to be a tenant having protection for eviction under the tenancy laws. Taking into consideration the various tenancy laws applicable in the State of Punjab and the law discussed by this Court and the High Court, in our considered opinion the trial court, the appellate court Full Judgment