Judgments - Tenders
National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited Versus Montecarlo Limited & Anr.
M/s AGMATEL INDIA PVT. LTD. VERSUS M/s RESOURSYS TELECOM & ORS.
M/s. Rajpal Construction Co. Vs. The State of M.P. and Ors.
Law laid down - Held:- 1. The jurisdiction of the High Court under section 19 of the Act of 1983 is limited to the grounds mentioned in Section 19(2) of the Act of 1983. 2. In absence of production of the works contract before the Tribunal, it cannot be decided whether, the parties had obligation to approach the final authority under the works contract. Full Judgment
M/S. DURGA WELDING WORKS VERSUS CHIEF ENGINEER, RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION, ALLAHABAD & ANR.
Community Action Through Motivation Program (CAMP) Versus State of M.P. and others
THE VICE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD.& ANR. VERSUS SHISHIR REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ETC.
M/S. NARINDER SINGH AND SONS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
WELSPUN SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LIMITED VERSUS OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.
M/s B.K. Enterprises Versus The State of Manipur and Another
Vatash Sharma Vs. Indore Development Authority & another
Law laid down - 1. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Madhya Pradesh Vikas Pradhikarano Ki Sampatiyon Ka Prabandhan Tatha Vyayan Niyam, 2018 - Vyayan Niyam prescribes the method for disposal of the property of Development Authority. The IDA issued NIT for third and fourth time respectively. After cancelling the bid of petitioners, the new NIT was issued based on the fact that after end of Corona curfew, the market value of shops is enormously enhanced. This is not the factor Full Judgment
Vaibhavi Enterprise Versus Nobel Cera Coat & Ors.
UFLEX LTD. Versus GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
M/s.Shanti Construction Vs. M/s.Aavantika Gas Ltd & Ors.
Law laid down - 1. Constitution of India – Article 12 – Whether Avantika Gas Ltd (AGL) is an instrumentality/authority and amenable to writ jurisdiction of High Court. As per averments of reply of AGL - it is a public company limited - a joint venture of two PSUs namely GAIL and HPCL - government does not hold share in AGL “directly” - government has no pervasive/deep control in the “day to day affairs” of AGLgovernment has no direct share holding Full Judgment
M/s K & J Projects Private Limited Versus Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation & anr.
AICONS Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Versus Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation & anr.
MONTECARLO LIMITED & ANR VERSUS NATIONAL HIGH SPEED RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED
Multitask Solutions Versus Zilla Parishad Washim & Ors.
SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. & ORS. Versus M/s. S. KUMAR’s ASSOCIATES AKM (JV)
Mohammad Sultan Khan Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Law laid down - Article 226 of the Constitution – Judicial review of contract matter – Law summarised- if the decision making process is shown to be arbitrary, unreasonable and hits Wednesbury principles, interference can be made. Clause 8 of the NIT – The bidder was required to furnish informations regarding the vehicle to be provided by him. The respondent No.4 has not filled up relevant entries of the prescribed form and did not file relevant documents along with his tender. The Full Judgment