Judgments - Tenders
Manoj Kumar Vs. State of MP & others
Law laid down - The peon and salesman etc. appointed in country/foreign liquor shops run by the excise department and were terminated 4-5 years thereafter on account of the subsequent change in policy to auction such shops, are not entitled to regularization/absorption in government service as they do not fulfill the requisite conditions contained in the scheme dated 16/5/2007 framed by the State government on the basis of the judgment of the supreme court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Full Judgment
PRENIT WORLD LLP Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
SUNFLAG IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Law Laid Down - In absence of any averment by the petitioner in respect of completion of stage of third sub-menu (Attach Documents); the attaching documents and/or the bid acknowledgment not received from the system as per the tender conditions, it cannot be said that the decision to declare that the petitioner did not submit technical bid online lacks bona fide. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered Full Judgment
M/s Goel Roadways Vs. State of M.P. & Another
Law Laid Down - The argument of the petitioner that the respondent could pick and choose a particular property to assess the net worth of the tenderer is not acceptable as the respondents cannot resort to such method to assess the net worth of the tenderer. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered with while exercising writ jurisdiction of this Court, as this Court while exercising power of judicial Full Judgment
M/S. ANEJA CONSTRUCTION (I) LTD. THROUGH AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE Vs. UOI AND ORS.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. M/s Optel Telecommunication Ltd
Law Laid down - The learned Arbitrator is bound by the terms of Agreement. Therefore, an award rendered by such an arbitrator cannot be sustained if an Arbitrator has traveled beyond the terms of the agreement to hold that there was an oral agreement prior to placing of Advance Purchase Order, which was accepted by the respondents. The terms of the contract stand crystallized with the issuance of Advance Purchase Order and acceptance of the same. The Arbitral Tribunal has to take Full Judgment
Vishwanath Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law Laid Down - S.52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 – in absence of seizure of forest produce or its Panchanama, entire confiscation proceedings initiated in respect of vehicle cannot be allowed to sustain. Full Judgment
UNIMEDITREK PVT. LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
M/S. VECTRA ADVANCED ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Vs. UOI AND ANR.
SRI CHITTARANJAN MAITY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
SANJAY M.PAWAR Vs MALEGAON MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR
UMA PRASAD UPADHYAYA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
ANURADHA SHARMA Vs. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR
M/S. T&T PROJECTS LTD. VS THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND 4 ORS.
M/S. HARYANA CARRIERS AND ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Mrs. Kalpana Khiwani & another Vs. Madhya Pradesh Housing & Infrastructure Development Board
Balaji Dubey Vs Bhopal Sahakari Dugdha Sangh Maryadit
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs. HBL NIFE POWER SYSTEMS LTD
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP Vs. RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS
Further, the High Court has failed to consider another important fact that the Government being guardian of public finance it has right to refuse the lowest or any other tender bid or bids submitted by the bidders to it provided its decision is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable as it amounts to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The appellant- Corporation’s decision in cancelling Full Judgment