Judgments - Work Contract
Kundan Mukati S/o. Badrilal Mukati. V/s. State of M.P. & others
Espan Infrastructure (I) Limited Vs. The State of Bihar
M/s Anil Rubber Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. & Ors.
Maa Vaishno Enterprises and others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another
SUPER MEDICARE AGENCIES VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
ABHAY KUMAR PANDEY VERSUS NATIONAL AIDS CONTROL ORGANIZATION (NACO) (THROUGH ITS SECRETARY) & ANR
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI (MCGM) VERSUS ABHILASH LAL & ORS.
MODICARE LIMITED VERSUS GAUTAM BALI & ORS
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VERSUS ANIL BHASIN
M/S ICOMM TELE LTD. VERSUS PUNJAB STATE WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD & ANR.
M/s Associated Alcohol & Breweries Ltd. vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
M/s Associated Alcohol & Breweries Ltd. vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
Siddhi Vinayak & Another Vs. Union of India & Others
M/s Dilip Buildcon Ltd. Vs. Ghyanshyam Das Dwivedi
Manoj Kumar Vs. State of MP & others
Law laid down - The peon and salesman etc. appointed in country/foreign liquor shops run by the excise department and were terminated 4-5 years thereafter on account of the subsequent change in policy to auction such shops, are not entitled to regularization/absorption in government service as they do not fulfill the requisite conditions contained in the scheme dated 16/5/2007 framed by the State government on the basis of the judgment of the supreme court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Full Judgment
PRENIT WORLD LLP Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
SUNFLAG IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Law Laid Down - In absence of any averment by the petitioner in respect of completion of stage of third sub-menu (Attach Documents); the attaching documents and/or the bid acknowledgment not received from the system as per the tender conditions, it cannot be said that the decision to declare that the petitioner did not submit technical bid online lacks bona fide. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered Full Judgment