Judgments - Work Contract
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. M/s Optel Telecommunication Ltd
Law Laid down - The learned Arbitrator is bound by the terms of Agreement. Therefore, an award rendered by such an arbitrator cannot be sustained if an Arbitrator has traveled beyond the terms of the agreement to hold that there was an oral agreement prior to placing of Advance Purchase Order, which was accepted by the respondents. The terms of the contract stand crystallized with the issuance of Advance Purchase Order and acceptance of the same. The Arbitral Tribunal has to take Full Judgment
M/s. National Building Construction Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors.
M/s. Sunder Marketing Associates versus State of Haryana & Ors.
MEGHA TECHNICAL & ENGINEERS (PVT.) LTD. VS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
JSW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND ANR. Vs. KAKINADA SEAPORTS LIMITED AND ORS.
BINDESHWARI CHAUDHARY Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 20.05.2008, passed by High Court of Judicature at Patna, whereby Letters Patent Appeal No. 436 of 2000 was disposed of allowing respondent authorities to withhold 50% of gratuity and 50% of pension, of the appellant. It is also nobody’s case that the appellant caused pecuniary loss to the exchequer. In the light of above, we find force in submission of Full Judgment
VENKATESH CONSTRN.CO. Vs. KARNATAKA VIDYUT KARKHANE LTD.(KAVIKA)
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. Vs. NILOUFER SIDDIQUI & ORS.
MANYATA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U.P & ORS
District Magistrate should have simply certified her character because that was the only question which the former was called upon to examine while dealing with the request made by the appellant. The District Magistrate, however, appears to have been swayed by considerations wholly extraneous to the question whether the appellant had a good moral character. it is Full Judgment
NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORP. LTD. Vs. M/S ASHOK KUMAR SINGH & ORS.
-While the technical bids were opened and found compliant, the financial bids had yet to be opened when the respondents moved an application addressed to the AGM (C&M) of the appellant-corporation at Rai Bareilly withdrawing the bids submitted by it and asking for being excluded from consideration besides praying for refund of the earnest money deposited with the bids. - -The expression "revocation of tender" does not Full Judgment