Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Rohit Jain Vs. M.P.P.S.C. & Another
Law laid down - 1. Doctrine of Estoppel cannot be used as a shelter when the constitutional body itself commits a mistake or illegality in evaluating the answer sheet of the candidate. More so, when it is obliged to evaluate the answer sheet with accuracy and precision. 2. In absence of any provision under the statute/regulations, the Court should not ‘generally’ direct revaluation. In a case where error is glaring, apparent and admitted, direction for rechecking, re-evaluation can be granted. Full Judgment
Ajay Batham and another Vs. State of M.P. and another
Bhartiya Drugs and Chemicals Shramik Karmchari Parishad Vs.State of M.P.& others
Liyakatuddin Versus State of M.P
Hakamsingh and another Versus State of M.P.
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Sheikh Sadik
Law Laid Down: The presumption of correctness of date of birth in the matriculation certificate cannot be disputed on the basis of approximate age given by the doctor who medico-legally examined the victim - Supreme Court decision reported as (2013) 7 SCC 263 (Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana) - followed. The prosecutrix was staying in the house of the accused, who were providing her education, food, clothes and residence as her parents could not pay the fee of the school. Under Full Judgment
Sunil Adiwasi Vs. State of M.P.
Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others
Law Laid Down - The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new Full Judgment
SMT. ZARINA W/O NYAZ MOHAMMAD VS.STATE OF MP AND ANOTHER
SMT. REKHA W/O GHANSHYAM AND OTHERS VS.KANHAIYALAL S/O AMARSINGH AND ANOTHER
Ashok Lalwani Vs. State Bank of India
Law laid down - "Whether the First Appellate Court can pass an ex-parte stay of the judgement and decree passed by the trial Court without imposing any condition" Held - No. Full Judgment
Vinod alias Rahul Chouhtha - V/s - State of Madhya Pradesh P.S. Kotwali, Shahdol (M.P.)
Law Laid Down: The opinion of an expert is admissible in evidence u/S 293 of the CrPC and therefore, cannot be discarded on the basis of books on Medical Jurisprudence unless the passages which are sought to be discredited in the opinion of the expert are put to him - Judgments relied - AIR 1975 SC 905 (Phool Kumar vs. Delhi Administration) and AIR 1957 SC 589 (Bhagwan Das and another vs. State of Rajasthan). A DNA report must be accepted as scientifically Full Judgment
Amit Kumar Mishra Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
The scheme circulated by Madhya Pradesh State Employment Guarantee Council for appointment of Gram Rojgar Sahayak does not prescribe any condition that Gram Panchayat can add, modify or delete any of the conditions in the guidelines so framed and circulated. Though the Gram Panchayat is an independent juristic entity and third tier of governance but the funds are to be released by the State/M.P. Employment Guarantee Council. Therefore, the responsibility of the Gram Panchayat is to engage Gram Rojgar Sahayaks Full Judgment