Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
SANDEEP WASKALE Vs. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANOTHER
Premnarayan Yadav Vs. State of MP & another
Manoj Kumar Vs. State of MP & others
Law laid down - The peon and salesman etc. appointed in country/foreign liquor shops run by the excise department and were terminated 4-5 years thereafter on account of the subsequent change in policy to auction such shops, are not entitled to regularization/absorption in government service as they do not fulfill the requisite conditions contained in the scheme dated 16/5/2007 framed by the State government on the basis of the judgment of the supreme court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Full Judgment
Jehangir D. Mehta Vs. The Real Nayak Sakh Sahkari Maryadit and Another
Law laid down - The order or decision of the arbitration council under Section 57 of the Madhya Pradesh Swayatta Sahakarita Adhiniyam, 1999 is an arbitration award and it is not a decree passed by the civil court as defined under Section 2(2) of the CPC, hence the stamp duty as required by the Schedule 1A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1889 is payable for its execution. Full Judgment
Gajanand S/o Chamru Lal @ Bhuria Lohar Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - An act of attempt to commit an offence is totally different from an act of preparation to commit an offence. There is no evidence that after laying down on the prosecutrix, the appellant in order to commit rape put his penis on the vagina of the prosecutrix or made any further attempt to penetrate in the vagina of the prosecutrix or touch any sensual organ with hand. Hence, the act which has been proved shows only preparation. Moreso, Full Judgment
Smt. Ayasha Rathore Vs. State of M.P. and others
Rohit Jain Vs. M.P.P.S.C. & Another
Law laid down - 1. Doctrine of Estoppel cannot be used as a shelter when the constitutional body itself commits a mistake or illegality in evaluating the answer sheet of the candidate. More so, when it is obliged to evaluate the answer sheet with accuracy and precision. 2. In absence of any provision under the statute/regulations, the Court should not ‘generally’ direct revaluation. In a case where error is glaring, apparent and admitted, direction for rechecking, re-evaluation can be granted. Full Judgment
Ajay Batham and another Vs. State of M.P. and another
Bhartiya Drugs and Chemicals Shramik Karmchari Parishad Vs.State of M.P.& others
Liyakatuddin Versus State of M.P
Hakamsingh and another Versus State of M.P.
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Sheikh Sadik
Law Laid Down: The presumption of correctness of date of birth in the matriculation certificate cannot be disputed on the basis of approximate age given by the doctor who medico-legally examined the victim - Supreme Court decision reported as (2013) 7 SCC 263 (Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana) - followed. The prosecutrix was staying in the house of the accused, who were providing her education, food, clothes and residence as her parents could not pay the fee of the school. Under Full Judgment
Sunil Adiwasi Vs. State of M.P.
Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others
Law Laid Down - The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new Full Judgment