Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
SMT. REKHA W/O GHANSHYAM AND OTHERS VS.KANHAIYALAL S/O AMARSINGH AND ANOTHER
Ashok Lalwani Vs. State Bank of India
Law laid down - "Whether the First Appellate Court can pass an ex-parte stay of the judgement and decree passed by the trial Court without imposing any condition" Held - No. Full Judgment
Vinod alias Rahul Chouhtha - V/s - State of Madhya Pradesh P.S. Kotwali, Shahdol (M.P.)
Law Laid Down: The opinion of an expert is admissible in evidence u/S 293 of the CrPC and therefore, cannot be discarded on the basis of books on Medical Jurisprudence unless the passages which are sought to be discredited in the opinion of the expert are put to him - Judgments relied - AIR 1975 SC 905 (Phool Kumar vs. Delhi Administration) and AIR 1957 SC 589 (Bhagwan Das and another vs. State of Rajasthan). A DNA report must be accepted as scientifically Full Judgment
Amit Kumar Mishra Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
The scheme circulated by Madhya Pradesh State Employment Guarantee Council for appointment of Gram Rojgar Sahayak does not prescribe any condition that Gram Panchayat can add, modify or delete any of the conditions in the guidelines so framed and circulated. Though the Gram Panchayat is an independent juristic entity and third tier of governance but the funds are to be released by the State/M.P. Employment Guarantee Council. Therefore, the responsibility of the Gram Panchayat is to engage Gram Rojgar Sahayaks Full Judgment
Praveen Pandey Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law Laid Down - The High Court has power to issue a writ to any person or Authority including any Government within its territory for enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part-III of the Constitution of India and/or any other purpose. The writ jurisdiction is being exercised to protect the fundamental rights of the members of the Bar to appear in the Court and also the fundamental rights of the citizens of the State to get their cases decided Full Judgment
Dr. Sandeep Vs. State of M.P.
Kalicharan Vaidh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - (1) When Section 36 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993, can be invoked by the Collector. (2) Whether a stranger having no locus can move application under Section 36 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993, for removing the existing office bearer. Full Judgment
Shehzad s/o Abdul Karim v/s Sohrab s/o Gulji and others
Suprabhat Chouksey & others Vs. Union of India and Another
Law laid down - On striking off the name of the defaulting company on the ground of not filing the financial statement or annual returns for the statutory period as contemplated under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, the directors of the defaulting company become ineligible for being reappointed as Director of that company or appointed as Director in other companies for 5 years and on incurring the said disqualification the office of the Director becomes vacant under Section 167 Full Judgment
Prashant Shrivastava Vs. State of M.P.
Dr. Shraddha Saxena Versus State of M.P. & others
Mahesh Pahade Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Though it is the responsibility of the State to bring the accused to law but in such process the actual sufferer of crime cannot be permitted to stay outside the law and to watch the proceedings from hindsight. It will be travesty of justice if the victims of such heinous crime are denied right to address their grievances before the courts of law. - Relied upon - Declaration of "Basic Principles of Justice of Victim for Crime and Abuse of Full Judgment