Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Ashutosh Mishra & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Anr.
Brijendra Singh & another vs. State of M.P.
MEIL Prasad (JV) Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Another
Suraj Nath & Others Suraj Nath
Pradeep Jain Vs. Smt. Manjulata Jain Modi and another
Law laid down - "Whether the children of the first husband of the wife is entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C." Held - No. Full Judgment
Anil Dhakad S/o Benisingh Dhakad Vs. State of M.P. through
Himmatlal and others Vs. M/s Rajratan Concept and others
Patru S/o Kapura Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In this case, Bharosa was injured on 8.8.1998 and was medically examined on same day and his x-ray examination was conducted on 10.8.1998 and in his M.L.C. and x-ray report, there was no indication about any grievous injury received by him and during treatment he died on 28.8.1998 and according to unchallenged evidence of autopsy surgeon, Bharosa died of failure of surgical operation and due to perforation peritonitis as a result of blunt injury to abdomen and its Full Judgment
Surendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid Down - Simple self-serving statement that the petitioners are social workers is not sufficient to invoke the public interest writ jurisdiction of this Court unless the petitioners are able to produce on record to the satisfaction of the Court such social work in last couple of years is in the area in respect of which the public interest writ petition is filed. Public interest litigation in respect of acquisition of land at the instance of third person would not be Full Judgment
Narsingh v/s Vikram Viswavidyalaya
Jaheeruddin vs The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down - Bail u/s. 438/439 of Cr.P.C. - Article 51-A of the Constitution of India - emphasis made on the compliance of fundamental duties. Full Judgment
Rashmi Boudh & others v. State of M.P. & others
Law Laid Down - Madhya Pradesh Junior Administrative Service (Recruitments and Service Conditions of Service) Rules, 2011 (for short “the 2011 Rules”) contemplate that the candidates should have served at least for five years as Patwari in permanent or officiating capacity. In terms of the Scheme of appointment and the 2011 Rules, the petitioners were appointed to the service only after completion of training and on qualifying the written examination. Therefore, the period prior to their appointment to the service cannot Full Judgment
Ramji Tiwari & others v. State of M.P. & others
Law Laid Down - No age is contemplated in respect of limited competitive examination either in Rule 6 or Rule 13 of Madhya Pradesh Junior Administrative Service (Recruitments and Service Conditions of Service) Rules, 2011 (“in short “the Rules”). Therefore, the Schedule-V of the Rules prescribing the age limit for filling of the posts of Naib Tehsildar from amongst the Patwaris or Revenue Inspectors is without any corresponding support from the substantive provisions of the Rules. In view of the said fact, Full Judgment
Shivnarayan Verma (Panchal) Vs. Anjuman Ismail Muslemin & others
Union of India & Others vs. M/s. K. Kapoor & P.R. Mahant Khandwa
Law laid down - It is a mandatory requirement to file original or certified copy of the agreement alongwith the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for referring the matter for arbitration in a pending suit. Full Judgment