Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Smt. Baljeet Kaur Vs. Harjeet Singh
Law laid down - 1- Mandatory period as prescribed in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to 'the Act, 1955) is discretionary in nature and Court can consider if there is no possibility of the parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation. 2- The Court can view the medium of video conferencing for seeking divorce under Section 13-B of the Act, 1955 and can also permit genuine representation of the parties through close relations such as Full Judgment
Girraj Sharma Vs. State of MP
Dr. Sandeep Nahta vs. Smt. Deepa alias Jaya Nahta
Bhagwanti Bai Vs. State of MP & Others
Law Laid down - The Madhya Pradesh Bhumigat Pipe Line, Cable Evam Duct (Bhumi Ki Upyokta Ke Adhikaron Ka Arjan) Adhiniyam, 2012” [for short the ‘State Act’] is an Act enacted in pursuance of Entry 5, 6 and 17 of List II, of the 7th Schedule, and not in terms of Entry 43 of List III of the 7th Schedule. Therefore, the State Act is not repugnant to the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Full Judgment
Balwan Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - "Whether the power of recounting can be delegated- Held- No. "Whether the application for recounting should contain specific reasons for recounting as per Rule 80 of the Election Rules- Held- Yes. Full Judgment
A.K. Hade Vs. Shailendra Singh Yadav and another
Visnushankar (since dead) and others Vs. Girdharilal and others
MOHANLAL GARG AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANOTHER
Shri Gouri Ganesh Shri Balaji Constructions “C” Class Contractor Vs. Executive Engineer, PWD
Law Laid Down - The expression “ascertained amount” appearing in Section 2(1)(d) of the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (for short “the State Act”) includes the amount of consequential relief. Mere declaration of termination of contract is not the substantial relief and in the guise of mere declaration an aggrieved person cannot be permitted to omit the consequential relief which the party may be entitled to claim in a reference under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. It is held that reading of Full Judgment
Rashmi Thakur Vs. High Court of M.P. & others
Law Laid Down - The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 has made a departure from the provisions of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 as the reservation for the physically disabled candidates is not dependent on any condition. The reservation can be denied only if any Government establishment is exempted from the provisions of the Act by the Chief Commissioner or the State Commissioner. In absence of any decision to exempt Full Judgment