Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
M/s Rajsai Traders & others Versus Vinod
Law laid down - After the stage of Order XXXVII Rule 3(4) of the CPC, first stage is to seek leave from the Court under Rule 5 and if the said leave is granted permitting the defendants to defend unconditionally or on such terms as appear to be just, sub-rule (6) of Rule 3 of Order XXXVII of the CPC would attract “at the hearing of such summons for judgment”. In case leave not applied or refused at the stage of Full Judgment
Indore Development Authority & Another - V/s - Manorama Solanki & Another
Aftab Khan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Manoj Sharma - V/s - State of M.P. & Others
M/s Shriram Builders Vs. State of M.P. & others
Anil Kumar and Another vs. State of MP and Another
Abhay Kumar Katare Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) 'Abetment' – Involves a mental preparedness of a person to instigate or intentionally aiding a person in doing a thing. Without a positive act on the part of the accused to instigate or aid in committing suicide – no offence can be said to be made. (2) The intention of the Legislature is that to convict a person under section 306 IPC, there has to be a clear mens rea and close proximate link to commit the Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dr. Divya Darshan Sharma and others
Law Laid Down - In absence of any definition being provided in the Statute or any statutory rule or instructions supplementing the Khel Sansthaon Evam Khiladiyon Ko Arthik Sahayata, Khel Vritti, Sammannidhi Niyam, 2006 as to what is “representation in the National games or recognized Senior National championship”, the meaning has to be assigned what is understood by a common citizen. The participation in the Zonal or the Inter-university competitions cannot be treated to be a representation in the National level games or Full Judgment
Ramsingh Yadav vs. State of MP & anr.
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Ltd. v/s The Additional District Magistrate & Ors
Yogendra Dusaj vs. State of MP
The State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Nandu Ahirwar
Law laid down - 1. In a case of circumstantial evidence, there must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused. 2. In an appeal against the order of acquittal, the Court has to be very cautious in interfering with an appeal unless there are compelling and substantial grounds to Full Judgment
Chief Managing Director, WCL & others Vs. Sheikh Yusuf
Law Laid Down - In absence of any allegation that the date of birth was not correctly recorded in Form-B, a statutory form stipulated under the Mines Rules, 1955, the service record or certificate of registration with Employment Exchange, which are based upon declaration of the employee, cannot be made basis of holding that the date of birth was not correctly mentioned in Form-B. The approximate age determined by the Age Determination Committee to be between 50 to 55 years which Full Judgment
Ashish @ Banti Sen Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The evidence of injured eye-witness has great evidentiary value. Conviction can be based on the testimony of related eye-witnesses. Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar
R. S. Ashatkar Versus Central Bureau of Investigation, Bhopal
Principal, Maharshi Vidya Mandir Lehdra Naka, Sagar Vs. Labour Court, Sagar & Another
Law Laid Down - The scheme of the M.P. Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 particularly of Rule 10-A and Sub-rule (1) and (2) of Rule 10-B of the said Rules makes it abundantly clear that the notice of the first hearing is not required to be given when the party has already appeared before the Labour Court on the basis of the notice issued by the Court. Sub-rule (3) of Rule 10-B of the said Rules is not mandatory but pertains to matter of procedure and therefore, it Full Judgment