Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
State of Madhya Pradesh and others Vs. Yugal Kishore Sharma
Law Laid Down - The context in which other judgments are rendered interpreting a word appearing in a statute are not relevant for the purpose of the Madhya Pradesh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967. The provisions of the Act, as amended by Madhya Pradesh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Dwitiya Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 1998 are required to be interpreted keeping in view the language, context, object and purpose of the Statute in question. The amendments in the Act so as to extend the age is Full Judgment
Istfaq Mohammad Vs. State of M.P. & others
Chingu @ Sohanlal and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ramadhar @ Daddi Kachhi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (I) If, in presence of the accused at his house something wrong has happened with his wife, then in view of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, he is under burden to give a cogent explanation as to how the crime was committed. (II) Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
Vikram Singh Paur Late Shri Tukoji Rao Paur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kripal Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Evidence of the prosecutrix is similar to evidence of the injured-complainant or witness. The testimony of the prosecutrix if found to be reliable, per se, may be sufficient to convict a culprit and no corroboration of her evidence is necessary. In prosecution of rape, law does not require corroboration. Absence of injury – external or internal, on the body of the prosecutrix would not render the testimony of the prosecutrix unreliable. Full Judgment
Smt. Simmi Dhillo Versus Jagdish Prasad Dubey and another
Khemchand Kachhi Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Admissibility of statement tendered by an accused to the police – Extra-judicial confession, admissibility of the evidence of statement under Section 6 of the Evidence Act, res gestae. Full Judgment
Guddu & Durga Shankar Yadav & others Vs. The State of M.P.
Law laid down - To substantiate a charge under Section 302 with the aid of Section 34, it must be shown that the criminal act complained against was done by one of the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention of the both. Common intention has to be distinguished from same or similar intention. Full Judgment
Dharmendra Jadon vs. State of M.P.
Radheshyam Soni Vs. State of M. P.
Law Laid Down - Scope under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. Full Judgment
Shrawan vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid down - 1. The conviction can be based on the testimony of child witness. 2. Even if, the witness turned hostile, it would not affect the case, if there is other evidence on record to prove the prosecution case Full Judgment
Manoj @ Bablu Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Jaswinder Singh and another Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Ashutosh Pawar Vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Another
Law Laid Down - * Decision of Criminal Court on the basis of compromise or an acquittal cannot be treated that the candidate possesses good character, which may make him eligible, as the criminal proceedings are with the view to find culpability of commission of offence whereas the appointment to the civil post is in view of his suitability to the post. The test for each of them is based upon different parameters and therefore, acquittal in a criminal case is Full Judgment
Vishwanath Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law Laid Down - S.52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 – in absence of seizure of forest produce or its Panchanama, entire confiscation proceedings initiated in respect of vehicle cannot be allowed to sustain. Full Judgment
M/s Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited Vs. Northern Coal Field Limited
Law Laid Down - * Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 deals with the appointment of Arbitrator without the intervention of the Court whereas appointment with the intervention of the Court is contemplated under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act. * The limitation for filing a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act is contemplated by the Limitation Act particularly Article 137 of the Schedule-I of the Limitation Act, 1963. The limitation does not start from the notice but Full Judgment