Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Prasanna Kumar and another Versus State of M.P.
Law laid down - None explanation of injuries to the accused or to the deceased with a particular weapon is not always fatal, if there is specific ocular evidence. Section 149 of IPC makes every member of an unlawful assembly at the time of committing the offence guilty of that offence on the principle of constructive liability. In the case of inconsistency between medical evidence and ocular evidence priority has to be given to ocular evidence ignoring the minor discrepancies. Full Judgment
Amar Singh Kamria and Ors. Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law Laid Down - 1. An application u/s 319 Cr.P.C is entertainable only when implicative evidence (documentary or oral) having probative value more convincing than grave suspicion is brought on record during trial. The other pieces of evidence which have already been brought on record between the stages of taking cognizance and the commencement of trial can be used only for corroborative purpose. Meaning thereby that if any evidence is considered during the investigative process and is not brought on record Full Judgment
Shushila Bai & 6 Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & 4 Others
Madhushree Mishra Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & Ors.
Arun Shankar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Pintu alias Vinod Singh Vs State of M.P.
Gappe alias Vimlesh Vs State of M.P.
Prakash Chandra & Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of M.P. Vs. Raju alias Rajendra Singh & Ors.
Padamnath & Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ajay Gokhale Vs. Smt. Ranjana @ Ashwini Gokhale
Ramkripal Singh and 4 others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Vinay Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (i) Conviction can be based upon the evidence of child witness and circumstantial evidence. (ii) DNA analysis report can be considered for holding the accused guilty. Full Judgment
Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid Down - Relating to Section 18(4)(a) of MPVAT Act for levy of interest Full Judgment