Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Antar Singh Darbar Versus Kailash Vijayvargiya & Ors.
VINEETA PRAJAPATI Vs. BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANOTHER
Gul Singh @ Gulab Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Matsya Udyog Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Omprakash Gupta Versus State of MP and another
Vinod S/o Rammlalji Chopra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Munna @ Kaniram & another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Anil Kumar Godha Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Suryabhan Choudhary Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Siddhamuni S/o Bisale Patel
Law laid down - If the testimony of prosecutrix is found trustworthy, the accused can be convicted even in the absence of evidence of lady doctor. Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh and others Versus Rajesh Kumar Shukla
Law laid down - The doctrine of equal pay for equal work would not be applicable even if the employees in two groups are doing identical work, unless there is complete and wholesale identity between them. The same can be invoked only when the employees are similarly situated. Full Judgment
M/s Pankaj Kumar Rai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid down - In the light of series of decisions of the Supreme Court, it is well settled that the provisos of the Statutes have to be read as a whole by giving harmonious construction to all the provisions of the law so that none of the provision is rendered redundant. Keeping in view the principle of harmonious construction, the third proviso to Rule 68(1) of M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 is additional relaxation to Rule 4 and 68(1) of the Full Judgment
Santosh Singh & Others Versus State of M.P
Abhilash Versus State of M.P
Uday Narayan Versus State of M.P
Manish Kumar Thakur Vs. State of M.P. & Others
Anil Pandre Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Conviction can be based on the circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jabalpur & another
Law Laid Down: (i) Limitation -inordinate delay in filing reference is required to be dealt with by the Labour Court in its proper perspective – In the present case, application for reinstatement was filed after 4 years, the same is held liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. Reliance is placed on Prabhakar vs Joint Director, Sericulture Department and another, (2015) 15 SCC 1 (ii) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section 25 - B(2)(a)(ii) - Burden of proof – Full Judgment