Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Smt. Saroj Rajak & another Vs. State of M.P.
Democratic Lawyers Forum Vs. Union of India & Others
Law Laid down - (1) Public Interest Litigation in service matters like selection, appointment, promotion, seniority and also disciplinary proceedings is not maintainable. Reliance is placed upon Janata Dal Vs. H.S. Choudhary, (1992) 4 SCC 305; Rajnit Prasad Vs. Union of India, (2000) 9 SCC 313; and, Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha Vs. Dhobei Sahoo and others, (2014) 1 SCC 161. (2) A citizen has a fundamental right to meet a person of his choice. Reliance is placed upon Writ Petition Full Judgment
Rajesh Kumar Miglani & Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law Laid Down - The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 being the Central Legislation does not contemplate grant of fitness certificate and it is left to be framed by the State Government, therefore, the issue of fitness certificate and payment of tax falls within the legislative competence of the State in terms of Section 65(2)(d) of the Act of 1988 and under Section 3 of the M.P. Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991. Thus, Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 48 of the M.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, Full Judgment
Rakesh Singh Rathore Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Harish Tiwari Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - "Whether the advice of the Public Service Commission is required to be supplied to the delinquent before imposing any penalty- Held- Yes. "Whether the Enquiry Officer should record the reasons of each article of charges by discussing the evidence- Held-Yes. Full Judgment
Natthu Versus State of M.P.
Law laid down - Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
Mohanlal Yadav Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Laxman Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Iqbal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence including 'last seen together' theory. Full Judgment
Sukhchain and others. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others.
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Jagdish Prasad Dubey and others
If tractor insured for agricultural purpose was being used for other purpose, this is breach of terms and condition of Insurance Policy. Hence, the Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation to the claimant. Full Judgment
Shri Sandeep Dubey Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
T.R. Taunk Vs. State of M. P. & another
Lakshminarayan vs. Smt. Sudamabai & Ors.
Dr. (Smt.) Asha Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law Laid Down - (i) The interpretation of the phrase “Government Teacher” as provided under the Madhya Pradesh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshkiya Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967. Also distinguished the case of Padam Kumar Vs. State of M.P. and others, in W.P. No.13763/2013(s) decided on 30.01.2014, as also Dr. Kanti Lal Sahu and another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another, in W.P. No.5237/2012 decided on 17.01.2013. Full Judgment
Chhindwara Plus Developers Limited - V/s - Union of India & Others
The provisions of Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 will not have overriding effect over the provision of the Electricity Act, 2003 or for that matter the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 as none of the provisions of the SEZ Act deal with the erection of transmission lines which is part of the Electricity Act read with Telegraph Act. Therefore, it cannot be said that the provisions Full Judgment
Ramanda @ Yashvant Gond -Vs- State of Madhya Pradesh
Shankar Gadariya -Vs- State of Madhya Pradesh
Nitin Pathak - V/s - State of M.P. & Others
(1) In exercise of power of Judicial Review, the Court should not refer the matter to court appointed expert as the courts have a very limited role particularly when no mala fides have been alleged against the experts constituted to finalize answer key. It would normally be prudent, wholesome and safe for the courts to leave the decisions to the academicians and experts. (2) Secondly this Court does not and should not act as Court of Appeal in the matter of Full Judgment