Judgments - Supreme Court of India
AGYAPAUL SINGH Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA (SAMB)
RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU Vs. STATE(NCT OF DELHI)
The chain leading to the sole conclusion that it is the accused persons and nobody else who had committed the crime is not established by the three circumstances set forth above, even if all of such circumstances are assumed to be proved against the accused. Reliance has also been placed on the decision of this Court in the case of Sanwat Khan and Anr. vs. State Full Judgment
STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Vs. NIKHIL RANJAN CHAKRABORTY & ORS.
The law is thus clear that a candidate has the right to be considered in the light of the existing rules, namely, “rules in force on the date” the consideration takes place and that there is no rule of absolute application that vacancies must invariably be filled by the law existing on the date when they arose. As against the case of total exclusion and Full Judgment
VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD FORMERLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE SOUTH LTD Vs. LALIT K GUPTA
SOUTHERN MOTORS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
SAFETY RETREADING CO. PVT.LTD. Vs. COMM.OF CUSTOMS & CENT.EXCISE,SALEM
MEERA SANTOSH PAL AND ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The crucial consideration in the present case is whether the right to bodily integrity calls for a permission to allow her to terminate her pregnancy. The report of the Medical Board clearly warrants the inference that the continuance of the pregnancy involves the risk to the life of the pregnant woman and a possible grave injury to her physical or mental health as required by Section 3 (2)(i) of Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. K.P. SINGH AND ANR.
SHRI KAILASH VIJAYVARGIYA Vs. ANTAR SINGH DARBAR AND ORS
UNITED FINANCE CORPORATION Vs. M.S.M. HANEEFA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
SALONI ARORA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the parties on the strength of law laid down by this Court in the case of Daulat Ram vs. State of Punjab, (AIR 1962 SC 1206) that in order to prosecute an accused for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is rendered Full Judgment
TUPPADAHALLI ENERGY INDIA PVT LTD Vs. KARNATAKA ELEC. REG. COMM. & ANR
SRI GANESH Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
“Age determination inquiry” contemplated under Section 7-A of the Act read with Rule 12 of the 2007 Rules enables the court to seek evidence and in that process, the court can obtain the matriculation or equivalent certificates, if available. Only in the absence of any matriculation or equivalent certificates, the court needs to obtain the date of birth certificate from the Full Judgment
MD. SAJJAD @ RAJU @ SALIM Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The identification parade itself was held 25 days after the arrest. Their chance meeting was also in the night without there being any special occasion for them to notice the features of any of the accused which would then register in their minds so as to enable them to identify them on a future date. The chance meeting was also for few Full Judgment
AJAY SINGH AND ANR AND ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR
Performance of judicial duty in the manner prescribed by law is fundamental to the concept of rule of law in a democratic State. It has been quite often said and, rightly so, that the judiciary is the protector and preserver of rule of law. Effective functioning of the said sacrosanct duty has been entrusted to the judiciary and that entrustment expects the courts to conduct Full Judgment