Judgments - Supreme Court of India
MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
That detention in custody of under-trial prisoners for an indefinite period would amount to violation of Article 21 of the Constitution was highlighted. Full Judgment
SANGITA VILAS INGLE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
STATE OF U.P. Vs. PURAN SINGH & ORS.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. FATEHKARAN MEHDU
The scope of interference and exercise of jurisdiction under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. has been time and again explained by this Court. Further, the scope of interference under Section 397 Cr.P.C. at a stage, when charge had been framed, is also well settled. At the stage of framing of a charge, the court is concerned not with the proof of the allegation rather it has to focus on the material and Full Judgment
MGR INDUSTRIES ASSO. AND ANR Vs. STATE OF U P AND ORS
PUKHARAJMAL SAGARMAL LUNKAD(D)BY LRS&ORS Vs. THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, JALGAON & ORS
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION Vs. MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI VEDIC VISHWAVIDYALAYA
MEERUT KENDRIYA THOK UPBHOKTA SAHAKARI BANDAR Vs. VAKIL CHAND JAIN AND ORS ETC.ETC.Q
AMRUTBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI PATEL Vs. SUMANBHAI KANTIBHAI PATEL & ORS.
STATE OF H.P. AND ORS. Vs. NAVAL KUMAR ALIAS ROHIT KUMAR
SURESH SINGHAL Vs. STATE(DELHI ADMINISTRATION)
SANDEEP KHANUJA Vs. ATUL DANDE & ANR.
VIJAY PANDURANG THAKRE & ORS. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
P. SIVANANDI Vs. RAJEEV KUMAR & ORS.
These appeals raise a narrow question for consideration, namely, whether the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of an officer forms a part of his ‘service record’ and whether it could be ignored for the purposes of his promotion merely on the ground that it was written after some delay. In our opinion, the ACR of an officer forms a part of his service record and he cannot be Full Judgment