Judgments - Supreme Court of India
SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA
RAM SUNDER SEN Vs. NARENDRA @ BODE SINGH PATEL & ANR.
It is a settled law that when prosecution relies on circumstantial evidence, the following tests to be clearly established: (i) The circumstances from which an inference of guilt is sought to be drawn, must be cogent Full Judgment
K.A.KOTRAPPA REDDY & ANR. Vs. RAYARA M.REDD@ N.R.MANJUNATHA & ORS.
SANGHI BROTHERS (INDORE) PVT LTD Vs. MUKTINATH AIRLINES (P) LTD AND ANR.
M/S MANGALORE GANESH BEEDI WORKS Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE & ANR
KRISHIKA LULLA & ORS. Vs. SHYAM VITHALRAO DEVKATTA & ANR
B.S. SHESHAGIRI SETTY & ORS. ETC. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. ETC.
SUMER BUILDERS PVT. LTD. Vs. NARENDRA GORANI
RATNESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY Vs. INDIRA GANDHI INST. OF M.S. PATNA & ORS.
PRAVEEN KUMAR SAI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
N.SUNKANNA Vs. STATE OF A.P.
The prosecution has not examined any other witness present at the time when the money was demanded by the accused and also when the money was allegedly handed-over to the accused by the complainant. The complainant himself had disowned his complaint and has turned hostile and there is no other evidence to prove that the accused had made any demand. In short there is no Full Judgment
SUNIL KUMAR & ETC. ETC. Vs. BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.
What was held, in our view, was that scaling is a method which was generally unsuitable to be adopted for evaluation of answer papers of subjects common to all candidates and that the application of the said method to the examination in question had resulted in unacceptable results. Holding of public examinations involving wide and Full Judgment
FARUK ILAHI TAMBOLI & ANR Vs. B.S.SHANKARRAO KOKATE(D) BY LRS.& ORS.
SANJIV RAJENDRA BHATT Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
AJITHKUMAR P AND ORS Vs. REMIN K R AND ORS
In view of the legal position enunciated by this Court in the aforesaid cases the conclusion is irresistible that a student who is entitled to be admitted on the basis of merit though belonging to a reserved category cannot be considered to be admitted against seats reserved for reserved category. It is application Full Judgment
ASGER IBRAHIM AMIN Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA
To summarise, normally, a belated service related claim will be rejected on the ground of delay and laches (where remedy is sought by filing a writ petition) or limitation (where remedy is sought by an application to the Administrative Tribunal). One of the exceptions to the said rule is cases relating to a continuing wrong. Where a service related claim is based on a continuing wrong, relief can be granted even if there is Full Judgment