Judgments - Supreme Court of India
S.SREEDHAR REDDY & ORS. Vs. GOVT.OF A.P. & ORS.
D.M.,ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SWAPNA NAYAK & ORS
AGYAPAUL SINGH Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA (SAMB)
RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU Vs. STATE(NCT OF DELHI)
The chain leading to the sole conclusion that it is the accused persons and nobody else who had committed the crime is not established by the three circumstances set forth above, even if all of such circumstances are assumed to be proved against the accused. Reliance has also been placed on the decision of this Court in the case of Sanwat Khan and Anr. vs. State Full Judgment
STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Vs. NIKHIL RANJAN CHAKRABORTY & ORS.
The law is thus clear that a candidate has the right to be considered in the light of the existing rules, namely, “rules in force on the date” the consideration takes place and that there is no rule of absolute application that vacancies must invariably be filled by the law existing on the date when they arose. As against the case of total exclusion and Full Judgment
VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD FORMERLY KNOWN AS VODAFONE SOUTH LTD Vs. LALIT K GUPTA
SOUTHERN MOTORS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
SAFETY RETREADING CO. PVT.LTD. Vs. COMM.OF CUSTOMS & CENT.EXCISE,SALEM
MEERA SANTOSH PAL AND ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The crucial consideration in the present case is whether the right to bodily integrity calls for a permission to allow her to terminate her pregnancy. The report of the Medical Board clearly warrants the inference that the continuance of the pregnancy involves the risk to the life of the pregnant woman and a possible grave injury to her physical or mental health as required by Section 3 (2)(i) of Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. K.P. SINGH AND ANR.
SHRI KAILASH VIJAYVARGIYA Vs. ANTAR SINGH DARBAR AND ORS
UNITED FINANCE CORPORATION Vs. M.S.M. HANEEFA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
SALONI ARORA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the parties on the strength of law laid down by this Court in the case of Daulat Ram vs. State of Punjab, (AIR 1962 SC 1206) that in order to prosecute an accused for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is rendered Full Judgment
TUPPADAHALLI ENERGY INDIA PVT LTD Vs. KARNATAKA ELEC. REG. COMM. & ANR
SRI GANESH Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
“Age determination inquiry” contemplated under Section 7-A of the Act read with Rule 12 of the 2007 Rules enables the court to seek evidence and in that process, the court can obtain the matriculation or equivalent certificates, if available. Only in the absence of any matriculation or equivalent certificates, the court needs to obtain the date of birth certificate from the Full Judgment