Judgments
Sameer Kapoor and another Versus The State through SubDivision Magistrate South, New Delhi and others
JAGDISHRAJ KHATTA VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
SADAYAPPAN @ GANESAN VERSUS STATE, REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
VIKRAM JOHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR
The State Bank of India & Others. Versus P. Soupramaniane
Meaning of crime involving moral turpitude- There can be no manner of doubt about certain offences which can straightaway be termed as involvin gmoral turpitude e.g. offences under the Prevention ofCorruption of Act, NDPS Act, etc. The question that arises for our consideration in this case is whether an offence involving bodily injury can be categorized as a crime involving moral turpitude. In this case, we are concerned with an assault.. It is very difficult to state that every assault Full Judgment
GIRISH MITTAL Versus PARVATI V. SUNDARAM & ANR.
Mallikarjunaiah VERSUS Nanjaiah & Ors.
GOLI VIJAYALAKSHMI & ORS. VERSUS YENDRU SATHIRAJU(DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.
Y.SATHIRAJU (D) TR.HIS LRS. VERSUS GOLI KANNAYYA (DEAD) BY LRS.
Shyam Narayan Chouksey Versus Union of India and others
Suresh Kumar S/o Kishanlal Jain Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Hirabai (D) Thr. L.Rs. & Ors VERSUS Ramniwas Bansilal Lakhotiya (D) by L.Rs. & Ors
M/s Trimex Sands Pvt. Limited & Anr. VERSUS Union of India & Ors
Rajan Versus The Home Secretary, Home Department of Tamil Nadu and Ors
Afzal Ahmand Khan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Conviction under Section 395 of I.P.C. is permissible only when ingredients of Section 391 of I.P.C. are fulfilled. (2) Section 120-B of I.P.C.- Merely because certain stolen articles were recovered from the accused, they cannot be held to be dacoits by invoking presumption unless there is recent recovery from them. Possession of stolen property is an evidence of stolen property and in absence of any other evidence, it is not safe to draw an inference that the persons Full Judgment