Judgments
State by Lokayuktha Police Versus H. Srinivas
Meenakshi Saxena & Anr. Versus ECGC Ltd. (Formerly known as Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd.) and Anr.
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS. VERSUSALL U.P. CONSUMER PROTECTION BAR ASSOCIATION
M/S. B. HIMMATLAL AGRAWAL VERSUS COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR.
MAHABIR INDUSTRIES VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
LT. COL. VIJAYNATH JHA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
SUNFLAG IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Law Laid Down - In absence of any averment by the petitioner in respect of completion of stage of third sub-menu (Attach Documents); the attaching documents and/or the bid acknowledgment not received from the system as per the tender conditions, it cannot be said that the decision to declare that the petitioner did not submit technical bid online lacks bona fide. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered Full Judgment
Siddharth Dev Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - "Whether as per proviso (i-a) of Section 51(1) any opportunity of hearing is required to be given before exercising the power of suo moto review - Held- Yes. "Whether any opportunity of hearing is required to be given before obtaining sanction from the higher authority for exercising the powers- Held- Yes. Full Judgment
SHIVANI SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS
Raghuveer Singh and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Where witnesses make inconsistent statements in their evidence either at one stage or at two stages, testimony of such witnesses become unreliable and unworthy of credence and in absence of special circumstances, no conviction can be based on the evidence of such witnesses. (2) Material improvements of version of eye-witness from FIR to the version given in the Court, said evidence cannot be taken into consideration. (3) Failure on part of investigating agency to recover any bloodstained Full Judgment
THE KERALA ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTORS ASSOCIATIO :Versus: THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
MS. X . VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR.
Amrit Paul Singh & Anr VERSUS TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Kiran Pal Singh VERSUS The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
District Basic Education Officer Allahabad VERSUS Sushila Jaiswal (Dead) through her Lrs and Ors.
Vaijnath Kondiba Khandke Versus State of Maharashtra and Another
M/s Goel Roadways Vs. State of M.P. & Another
Law Laid Down - The argument of the petitioner that the respondent could pick and choose a particular property to assess the net worth of the tenderer is not acceptable as the respondents cannot resort to such method to assess the net worth of the tenderer. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered with while exercising writ jurisdiction of this Court, as this Court while exercising power of judicial Full Judgment