Judgments
Naushad Ali Versus Mubarak Ali @ Bhura
Law laid down - Revision against the order passed in an election petition under the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961, Security deposit alongwith memo of Revision Petition under Rule 19(2) of Rules 1962 is mandatory. Security amount has to be deposited alongwith the revision petition. High Court has no discretion to condone the latches. Full Judgment
Rupinder Singh Sandhu Versus State of Punjab & Others
GURMEET PAL SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
SELVI Versus GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS.
KHURSHID AHMED VERSUS STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
MANOJ KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
SUSHILA AGGARWAL & ORS. VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
R.L. Jatav Vs. Station House Officer
Law Laid Down - A trial court while rendering a judgment in trial is empowered to direct the police to register an offence against one of the witnesses against whom the trial court while marshalling the evidence finds prima facie material of committing cognizable offence. By doing so, the trial court would not be overstepping its jurisdictional purview as the provision of Section 154 Cr.P.C. obliges the police to register an FIR on receipt of information of commission of cognizable offence from Full Judgment
SHYAMALI CHATTEREJEE VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BHILAI
Vinod Jain and Others vs. State of MP
SHEILA SEBASTIAN VERSUS R. JAWAHARAJ & ANR. ETC.
KUMAR VERSUS STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
MAHESH CHANDRA VERMA Versus THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Through: ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS.
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
Vijay Arjun Bhagat & Ors. VERSUS Nana Laxman Tapkire & Ors.
Suresh Singh & Anr. VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh
Smt. Baljeet Kaur Vs. Harjeet Singh
Law laid down - 1- Mandatory period as prescribed in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to 'the Act, 1955) is discretionary in nature and Court can consider if there is no possibility of the parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation. 2- The Court can view the medium of video conferencing for seeking divorce under Section 13-B of the Act, 1955 and can also permit genuine representation of the parties through close relations such as Full Judgment