Judgments - Anticipatory bail
KANCHAN KUMARI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
SADHNA CHAUDHARY VERSUS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SANCHIT ALAGH & ANR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Raman Vs. State of MP
DHEERAJ BHADVIYA VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
ABHISHEK KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF DELHI
SK. SUPIYAN @ SUFFIYAN @ SUPISAN v. THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Laxman Prasad Pandey Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
PREM SHANKAR PRASAD VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
Prashant Singh Rajput Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
NISHA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Bherulal Versus Central Government
Law laid down - Applicability of bar as provided under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in case of application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Admittedly, the provisions of the Act have harsher provisions for sentencing and even harsher when it comes to bail, as has been provided under Section 37 of the Act. In the case of Murleedharan v. State of Kerala, while dealing with a similar provision, Section 41-A of Full Judgment
ANIL KUMAR RATHORE VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
Chironjilal Kushwah Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down:- 1. Clause 16 of M.P. Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2015 does not contemplate opportunity of hearing before registration of F.I.R. to the police. It contemplates opportunity of hearing before proceeding for suspension or revocation of shop allotment and not for registration of F.I.R. 2. Section 2 (i a) of the Essential Commodities Act 1955 refers definition of Collector which includes Additional Collector and such other officers not below the rank of Sub-Divisional Officer and since in exercise of Full Judgment