Judgments - Anticipatory bail
SH. PRIYANK GUPTA VERSUS STATE
RAMESH BHARDWAJ VERSUS GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO
SASIKALA PUSHPA AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Jaheeruddin vs The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down - Bail u/s. 438/439 of Cr.P.C. - Article 51-A of the Constitution of India - emphasis made on the compliance of fundamental duties. Full Judgment
SUSHILA AGGARWAL & ORS. VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
Vinod Jain and Others vs. State of MP
Prem Giri VERSUS State of Rajasthan
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Akash Barediya
N.M. Shrivastava Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Law Laid Down - Criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners are not for violating the orders passed by the Supreme Court but as a factor to determine conspiracy in scheduling the second counselling for the extended period and permitting the candidates to be admitted on the last date. Thus, fixing of schedule by the petitioners cannot be an honest and bona fide exercise of administrative action but it is shaded with suspicion as it was not modified even when their attention Full Judgment
Dr. Vijay Kumar Pandya Vs. Union of India through CBI
Law Laid Down - Grant of anticipatory bail is to be considered in view of the grave accusation levelled against the accused and therefore, may be one of the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 70 years and suffering ailments, would not entitle him to concession of anticipatory bail. The modus operandi and gravity of accusation involving same crime number and almost similar allegations, as discussed in detail in the order passed in MCRC No.24600/2017 (Dr. Divya Kishore Satpathi vs. CBI) and connected Full Judgment
Dr. Divya Kishore Satpathi Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Law Laid Down - The action or inaction of the petitioners, who were running the medical colleges has denied admission to the large number of more meritorious candidates, who were, in fact, entitled to admission and thus, leading to their frustration. The entire process would be antithesis of the rule that the students should be admitted only on merit. The petitioners may not be an accused of taking life of a person but if the allegations are proved, they cannot commit more Full Judgment