Judgments - Anticipatory bail
Prashant Singh Rajput Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
NISHA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Bherulal Versus Central Government
Law laid down - Applicability of bar as provided under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in case of application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Admittedly, the provisions of the Act have harsher provisions for sentencing and even harsher when it comes to bail, as has been provided under Section 37 of the Act. In the case of Murleedharan v. State of Kerala, while dealing with a similar provision, Section 41-A of Full Judgment
ANIL KUMAR RATHORE VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
Chironjilal Kushwah Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down:- 1. Clause 16 of M.P. Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2015 does not contemplate opportunity of hearing before registration of F.I.R. to the police. It contemplates opportunity of hearing before proceeding for suspension or revocation of shop allotment and not for registration of F.I.R. 2. Section 2 (i a) of the Essential Commodities Act 1955 refers definition of Collector which includes Additional Collector and such other officers not below the rank of Sub-Divisional Officer and since in exercise of Full Judgment
TEJINDER PAL SINGH VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
FAROOQ DANDOO VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
OM PRAKASH DHANUKA Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR
M/S. SUPREME BHIWANDI WADA MANOR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
UMED SINGH VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Smt. Kantabai w/o Ashok Bhandari Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Section 82 (4) of Criminal Procedure Code for declaring an accused as a proclaimed offender is identical to Section 82 (1) of the Code. The only difference is the penal provisions for the same as provided under s.174A of IPC. The general principle that Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as (2012) 8 SCC 73 lays down is that for the purposes of an anticipatory bail, a proclaimed offender also includes an offender or a proclaimed Full Judgment
Sonu @ Vikas Bhandari Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The order dated 12.05.2020 passed by the Gwalior Bench of this Court in the case of Balveer Singh Bundela v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.5621/2020) cannot be followed in the light of the subsequent order passed by the Division Bench of this court passed in the case of Arif Masood v. State of Madhya Pradesh passed in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.45501/2020 dated 27.11.2020. Judgments referred to: (1) Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as Full Judgment