Filter by Date
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Ramlal Sharma V/s State of Chhattisgarh Through-Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, & Ors.

WPS->WRIT PETITON SERVICE MATTER, 352 of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 27, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

VEERENNDRA KUMAR DUBEY Vs. CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 32135 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015

The first and foremost is an unequivocal declaration that mere award of four red ink entries to an individual does not make his discharge mandatory. This implies that four red ink entries is not some kind of laxman rekha, which if crossed would by itself render the individual concerned undesirable or unworthy of retention in the force. Award of four red ink entries simply pushes the individual concerned into a grey area where Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ASGER IBRAHIM AMIN Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA

Appeal (Civil), 10251 of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2015

To summarise, normally, a belated service related claim will be rejected on the ground of delay and laches (where remedy is sought by filing a writ petition) or limitation (where remedy is sought by an application to the Administrative Tribunal). One of the exceptions to the said rule is cases relating to a continuing wrong. Where a service related claim is based on a continuing wrong, relief can be granted even if there is Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UOI & OTHERS Vs. NO. 3989606 P, EX-NK VIJAY KUMAR

Appeal (Civil), 6583 of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 26, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

A.N. SACHDEVA (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. Vs. MAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY,ROHTAK &ANR

Appeal (Civil), 626-627 of 2008, Judgment Date: Aug 10, 2015

Considering the principles enunciated under Articles 14 and 16 of  the Constitution, and that the benefit  is  not  an  ex  gratia  payment  but  a payment in recognition of  past  service,  in  our  opinion,  discrimination could  not  have  been  made  between  those   employees   who   have   been absorbed/allocated are  entitled  to  count  their  services  as  qualifying service for the purpose of pension and not those  who  have  been  appointed directly. Fact remains that  all  these  employees  have  served  in  Punjab University/Kurukshetra University/MD. University without  any  break.   M.D. University,  prior  to  Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Vs. MAHENDRA NATH SHARMA

Appeal (Civil), 1123 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

20. The antiquated notion of pension being a bounty a gratuitous payment depending upon the sweet will or grace of the employer not claimable as a right and, therefore, no right to pension can be enforced through court has been swept under the carpet by the decision of Full Judgment

Tags Pension
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF M P AND ORS Vs. HITKISHORE GOSWAMI

Appeal (Civil), 1892 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 16, 2015

The question, which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the Courts below were justified in allowing the respondent's writ petition and in consequence justified in issuing directions in the nature of writ of mandamus in relation to respondent's pension case. It was for the reason that respondent having voluntarily tendered his resignation from the said service without there being any condition Full Judgment

Tags Pension
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

WARSALIGANJ SAHKARI CHINI MILL MAZD.UNIN Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3937-3938 of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 16, 2015

Whether seasonal workers of the sugar factories stopped crushing years back would be entitled to retaining allowance, was the main issue agitated by the appellant-union before the High Court. In order to avoid any confusion, it is clarified that the seasonal workers attached to the sugar Full Judgment

Tags Pension
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Union of India & Anr. Versus Rajbir Singh

Appeal (Civil), 2904 of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2015

The essence of the rules, as seen earlier, is that a member of the armed forces is presumed to be in sound physical and mental condition at the time of his entry into service if there is no note or record to the contrary made at the time of such entry. More importantly, in the event of his subsequent discharge from service on medical ground, any deterioration in his health Full Judgment

Tags Pension
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Punjab Vs. Gian Chand & Ors.

Appeal (Civil), 9007 of 2012, Judgment Date: Dec 13, 2012

Full Judgment