Judgments - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings
Raju And Ors Vs The State Of U.P And Anr.
Smt. Janki Devi And Ors. Vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home Deptt Lucknow And Anr
Smt. Janki Devi And Ors. Vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home Deptt Lucknow And Anr
Mohd. Saleem @ Saleem And Ors Vs The State Of U.P And Anr.
Suresh Verma And Ors.Vs The State Of U.P And Anr
Babloo @ Umakant Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Shiv Pratap Singh Chauhan Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Gaurav Sisodia Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Aarti Sharma Vs Union Of India And 2 Others
Jay Ram Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Umesh Kumar And 3 Others Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Ram Lal And 2 Others VS State Of U.P. & Another
Goldi @ Aman Rajpoot Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Shiv Pratap Tiwari And Ors Vs The State Of U.P And Anr
Smt. Nandani Ramchandani And Ors. Vs. The State Of U.P And Ors.
Section 3 of PML Act clearly speaks that whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of the crime and projecting it as untainted property shall be guilty of the offences of money laundering. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the person who acquired the proceeds of crime is being helped by anybody directly or indirectly knowingly to convert that Full Judgment
Mohd. Naseem And Ors. Vs. The State Of U.P And Anr.
It is not res integra that learned Magistrate while accepting the final report can treat the protest petition as complaint. It is not in dispute that by accepting the final report, the order of taking cognizance has been passed. The provisions of Section 300, Cr.P.C. could not be attracted. It is well settled principle of law that after accepting the final report, the Magistrate can proceed on the basis of complaint or on the basis of protest petition treating it Full Judgment
Mahesh Thakur And 4 Others Vs. State Of U.P. & Another
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CR.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court Full Judgment
Kaptan Singh And 5 Others Vs. State Of U.P. & Another
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 CR.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court Full Judgment