Judgments - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings
SIRAJUL & ORS. Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. & ANR
24. It is, therefore, well settled that the right to speedy trial in all criminal persecutions (sic prosecutions) is an inalienable right under Article 21 of the Constitution. This right is applicable not only to the actual proceedings in court but also includes within its sweep the preceding police investigations as well. The right to speedy trial extends equally Full Judgment
STATE OF M.P Vs. MANISH & ORS
Vishal And 3 Others Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Sonu Singh Vs The State Of U.P And Ors.
Suggi @ Raj Kumar Vs The State Of U.P And Anr.
Raju And Ors Vs The State Of U.P And Anr.
Smt. Janki Devi And Ors. Vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home Deptt Lucknow And Anr
Smt. Janki Devi And Ors. Vs The State Of U.P Thru Secy., Home Deptt Lucknow And Anr
Mohd. Saleem @ Saleem And Ors Vs The State Of U.P And Anr.
Suresh Verma And Ors.Vs The State Of U.P And Anr
Babloo @ Umakant Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Shiv Pratap Singh Chauhan Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Gaurav Sisodia Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Aarti Sharma Vs Union Of India And 2 Others
Jay Ram Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Umesh Kumar And 3 Others Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Ram Lal And 2 Others VS State Of U.P. & Another
Goldi @ Aman Rajpoot Vs State Of U.P. & Another
Shiv Pratap Tiwari And Ors Vs The State Of U.P And Anr
Smt. Nandani Ramchandani And Ors. Vs. The State Of U.P And Ors.
Section 3 of PML Act clearly speaks that whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of the crime and projecting it as untainted property shall be guilty of the offences of money laundering. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the person who acquired the proceeds of crime is being helped by anybody directly or indirectly knowingly to convert that Full Judgment