Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Annu Singh V/s State Of U.P. & Another
PAWAN @ RAM SALA @ CHANDA V/s STATE (GOVT OF NCT)
HARDEI Vs. STATE OF U.P.
It is well accepted in criminal jurisprudence that F.I.R. may not contain all the details of the occurrence or even the names of all the accused. It is not expected to be an encyclopedia even of facts already known. There are varities of crimes and by their very nature, details of some crimes can be unfolded only by a detailed and expert investigation. This is more true in crimes involving conspiracy, economic offences Full Judgment
GYANESHWAR SHYAMAL Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
PARESHBHAI ANNABHAI SONVANE Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
EMP.STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION Vs. A.K.ABDUL SAMAD & ANR.
ANANT PRAKASH SINHA @ ANANT SINHA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
STATE OF M.P. Vs. GOLOO RAIKWAR & ANR.
SHAHID KHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
GAJANAN DASHRATH KHARATE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SADHU SARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. DATTARAJ & ORS.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. SYED UMAR SAYED ABBAS & ORS
B. VIRUPAKSHAIAH Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS
TEKAN ALIAS TEKRAM Vs. STATE OF M.P (NOW CHHATTISGARH)
BHARAMAPPA GOGI Vs. PRAVEEN MURTHY & ORS. ETC.
DEEPAK SURANA AND ORS Vs. STATE OF M.P
The agreements in question were not even recovered from the custody of the appellants and were recovered from the vendors themselves. The agreements being unilateral and not bearing the signatures of the appellants, mere execution of such agreements cannot be considered as a relevant circumstance against the appellants. There is nothing on record to indicate that the consideration mentioned in the agreement could be traced Full Judgment