Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
SRI AUROBINDO ASHRAM TRUST AND ORS Vs. R RAMANATHAN AND ORS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. HEMANT KAWADU CHAURIWAL ETC
It is a settled law that dying declaration can be the sole basis of conviction and it does not require any corroboration. But it is equally true that dying declaration goes against the cardinal principle of law that 'evidence must be direct'. Thus, dying declaration must be judged and appreciated in light of the surrounding circumstances Full Judgment
STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. BITTU & ANR. ETC.ETC.
BIMLA DEVI Vs. RAJESH SINGH & ANR.
MANGU Vs. DHARMENDRA & ANR.
NARENDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
NARENDER KUMAR Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
SAT PRAKASH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR
DTE GEN MD ACCN PROJECT Vs. IDEB PROJECTS PVT. LTD.
ALI HASAN @ MALLAH Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
MAYA DEVI & ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
SUJOY MITRA Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
M/S SHREE BHAGWATI STEEL ROLLING MILLS Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE & ANR.
SHAMSHER SINGH VERMA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
Special Judge, Kaithal, in Sessions Case No. 33 of 2014, and rejected the application of the accused for getting exhibited the compact disc, filed in defence and to get the same proved from Forensic Science Laboratory. The only point of relevance at present is whether the accused has been denied right of defence or not. In Ziyauddin Barhanuddin Bukhari vs. Brijmohan Ramdass Mehra and Full Judgment
RAJ SINGH @ RAJA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA TR.SEC.MINISTY OF HOME
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. RAMESH
KRISHNA BHATACHARJEE Vs. SARATHI CHOUDHURY AND ANR
PROF. N.K.GANGULY Vs. CBI NEW DELHI
“....Whether sanction is to be accorded or not, is a matter for the Government to consider. The absolute power to accord or withhold sanction on the Government is irrelevant and foreign to the duty cast on that Court which is the ascertainment of the true nature of the act.” “It is clear that the first part of Section 197(1) provides a special protection, inter Full Judgment
