Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
BOBBILI RAMAKRISHNA RAJU YADAV & ORS. Vs. STATE OF A P REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A P HYDERBAD A P AND AN
STATE OF ASSAM Vs. RAMEN DOWARAH
USMANGANI ADAMBHAI VAHORA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
PRIYANKA CHAWLA Vs. AMIT CHAWLA
SUDIP KR. SEN @ BILTU Vs. STATE OF W.B. & ORS.
AWADESH KUMAR JHA @ AKHILESH KUMAR JHA & ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR
DARSHAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
The word alibi means “elsewhere”. The plea of alibi is not one of the General Exceptions contained in Chapter IV of IPC. It is a rule of evidence recognized under Section 11 of the Evidence Act. However, plea of alibi taken by the defence is required to be proved only after prosecution has proved its case against the accused. In the present case said condition is fulfilled. Full Judgment
STATE OF A.P. Vs. PATCHIMALA VIGNESWARUDU @ VIGANNA
KRISHAN CHANDER Vs. STATE OF DELHI
it is clear that the High Court has recorded the concurrent findings on the charges framed against the Appellant in the impugned judgment and order. It has also failed to re-appreciate the evidence on record properly and consider the law on the relevant aspect of the case. Therefore, the said findings are not only erroneous in law but also suffer from error in law. Hence, the same is Full Judgment
Nand Lal V/s State Of U.P.
SRI AUROBINDO ASHRAM TRUST AND ORS Vs. R RAMANATHAN AND ORS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. HEMANT KAWADU CHAURIWAL ETC
It is a settled law that dying declaration can be the sole basis of conviction and it does not require any corroboration. But it is equally true that dying declaration goes against the cardinal principle of law that 'evidence must be direct'. Thus, dying declaration must be judged and appreciated in light of the surrounding circumstances Full Judgment